Miguel Guhlin linked to this 2019 article today. It’s the most clearly written on the debate between phonics and alternative methods of learning to read that I’ve seen. Phonics is contrasted with ‘three cuing’, proposed in 1967 by education professor Ken Goodman, where students are focused on what the word means, not what it sounds like. My take on reading this is that phonics really works when we already know the spoken language or are in a situation where we can practice it a lot. We already know the meaning, so associating a word with a sound is a quick route to comprehension. When learning a second language, however, we don’t have this advantage, and we don’t want to spend five or six years fully immersed in the spoken language before learning to read it. So there is much more emphasis on meaning. And no matter how you learn, to have advanced comprehension you’re going to need much more than phonics.
Web: [Direct Link] [This Post]
Recent Stories
Google Now Stuffing Ads Into Its AI Products
The internet search giant recently announced new ad spots companies can buy to bombard users with links to sponsored products.
Jan 15, 2026Is AI’s war on busywork a creativity killer? What the experts say
Tech companies are promising to automate mundane, time-consuming tasks. But these are often the gateway to moments of spontaneous inspiration.
Jan 15, 2026The Dark Side of Hot Seed Rounds in the Age of AI: When Founders Just Keep the Money
A Cautionary Tale from 2025/2026 Here’s something I never thought I’d have to write about, but after watching it happen three times in a single year (really more than that), it’s …