×
Why carbon footprint alone isn’t enough to assess AI’s sustainability
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

A public debate about the environmental impact of large language models has emerged, questioning how to properly assess their true sustainability costs and benefits beyond just carbon emissions.

The central argument; The environmental impact of artificial intelligence, particularly large language models (LLMs), requires a more nuanced evaluation framework that goes beyond simply measuring carbon footprints.

  • The current focus on CO2 emissions, while important, presents an incomplete picture of LLMs’ overall sustainability impact
  • Measuring only carbon footprints fails to capture the full range of environmental and social consequences of developing and deploying these AI systems

Broader sustainability considerations; A comprehensive sustainability assessment must examine both positive and negative impacts across multiple dimensions.

  • Environmental factors include not just carbon emissions but also resource consumption, e-waste generation, and effects on biodiversity
  • Social impacts encompass accessibility, economic effects, and potential benefits to society through improved efficiency and innovation
  • The relationship between environmental costs and social benefits needs careful analysis to determine if the trade-offs are justified

Key challenges; Developing a holistic framework for assessing AI sustainability presents significant complexities.

  • Traditional carbon footprint measurements may not capture the long-term environmental benefits that AI systems could enable
  • The global nature of AI development and deployment makes it difficult to accurately track and attribute environmental impacts
  • Balancing immediate environmental costs against potential future benefits requires careful consideration

Looking forward; The sustainability discussion around LLMs must evolve to incorporate both quantitative and qualitative metrics.

The rapid advancement of AI technology demands a more sophisticated approach to sustainability assessment that can effectively weigh environmental costs against societal benefits while considering long-term impacts on both natural resources and human communities.

Why the carbon footprint of generative large language models alone will not help us assess their sustainability

Recent News

Frieze New York 2025 confronts AI and tariff uncertainty

AI-generated works at Frieze showcase artists using machine learning as creative partners rather than simple tools, challenging traditional notions of authorship and artistic process.

AI models learn to spot when they’re being tested

Large language models can now more easily detect when they're being tested versus deployed in real-world scenarios after being trained on synthetic documents describing evaluation contexts.

Unpublished AI system allegedly stolen by synthetic researcher on GitHub

The repository allegedly contains an unpublished recursive AI system architecture with suspicious backdated commits and connection to a potentially synthetic researcher identity with falsified credentials.