Therapists are increasingly offering specialized therapy for “AI psychosis”—a controversial term describing mental health issues that arise from prolonged, unhealthy interactions with generative AI systems like ChatGPT. This emerging therapeutic focus has sparked heated debate within the mental health community, with some professionals arguing it represents a legitimate new area of concern while others dismiss it as an unnecessary rebranding of existing disorders.
The big picture: With nearly 700 million weekly ChatGPT users and billions more using competing AI platforms, a growing subset of users are experiencing what experts describe as distorted thinking and difficulty distinguishing reality from AI-generated content.
What AI psychosis involves: According to AI researcher Lance Eliot, the condition encompasses “an adverse mental condition involving the development of distorted thoughts, beliefs, and potentially concomitant behaviors as a result of conversational engagement with AI.”
- Symptoms typically include great difficulty differentiating what is real from what is not real.
- The condition often arises after prolonged and maladaptive discourse with AI systems.
- Multiple interconnected symptoms usually present as a collective set rather than isolated issues.
The controversy: Mental health professionals are divided on whether AI psychosis deserves recognition as a distinct therapeutic focus.
- Skeptics argue the condition isn’t listed in the DSM-5 diagnostic manual and may simply be existing disorders with a new label.
- Critics worry it’s a temporary fad that will fade as AI adoption normalizes.
- Some therapists contend existing mental health frameworks already cover these issues without needing AI-specific categorization.
Why supporters disagree: Proactive therapists argue they can’t wait for official recognition while people are suffering now.
- The formal research and codification process for new mental disorders takes extensive time.
- AI usage is becoming integral to daily life, making simple “avoidance” strategies unrealistic.
- Understanding AI’s role as a “co-creator” of delusions is essential for effective treatment.
How AI-focused therapy works: Therapists specializing in this area are developing AI-specific intervention strategies.
- AI education: Therapists explain how AI actually works to combat “magical thinking” about AI capabilities.
- Digital hygiene routines: Behavioral experiments help reduce problematic AI usage through structured limitations.
- Controlled AI exposure: Some therapists provide patients with supervised AI systems featuring stronger safeguards.
The triad approach: Some therapists are moving beyond the traditional therapist-patient relationship to include AI as a therapeutic tool.
- Therapists gain access to patient-AI conversations for better understanding of the dynamics.
- Supervised AI systems allow for closer monitoring of patient interactions.
- This approach faces legal challenges as some states prohibit AI use in mental health settings.
What they’re saying: The debate reflects broader tensions about AI’s role in mental health care.
- “The most beautiful things in the universe are inside the human mind,” said ethnobotanist Terence McKenna. “We need to make sure AI doesn’t mess up that beauty.”
- Proponents argue therapists must “chew gum and walk at the same time”—maintaining traditional expertise while adapting to AI-related challenges.
- Critics warn against creating an “all-or-nothing” debate that pits AI psychosis recognition against established mental health practices.
Why this matters: As AI becomes ubiquitous in daily life, mental health professionals face mounting pressure to address AI-related psychological issues, regardless of official diagnostic recognition. The growing number of patients bringing ChatGPT-generated mental health advice to therapy sessions suggests AI has already become “the 600-pound gorilla in the therapy room.”
Recent Stories
DOE fusion roadmap targets 2030s commercial deployment as AI drives $9B investment
The Department of Energy has released a new roadmap targeting commercial-scale fusion power deployment by the mid-2030s, though the plan lacks specific funding commitments and relies on scientific breakthroughs that have eluded researchers for decades. The strategy emphasizes public-private partnerships and positions AI as both a research tool and motivation for developing fusion energy to meet data centers' growing electricity demands. The big picture: The DOE's roadmap aims to "deliver the public infrastructure that supports the fusion private sector scale up in the 2030s," but acknowledges it cannot commit to specific funding levels and remains subject to Congressional appropriations. Why...
Oct 17, 2025Tying it all together: Credo’s purple cables power the $4B AI data center boom
Credo, a Silicon Valley semiconductor company specializing in data center cables and chips, has seen its stock price more than double this year to $143.61, following a 245% surge in 2024. The company's signature purple cables, which cost between $300-$500 each, have become essential infrastructure for AI data centers, positioning Credo to capitalize on the trillion-dollar AI infrastructure expansion as hyperscalers like Amazon, Microsoft, and Elon Musk's xAI rapidly build out massive computing facilities. What you should know: Credo's active electrical cables (AECs) are becoming indispensable for connecting the massive GPU clusters required for AI training and inference. The company...
Oct 17, 2025Vatican launches Latin American AI network for human development
The Vatican hosted a two-day conference bringing together 50 global experts to explore how artificial intelligence can advance peace, social justice, and human development. The event launched the Latin American AI Network for Integral Human Development and established principles for ethical AI governance that prioritize human dignity over technological advancement. What you should know: The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, the Vatican's research body for social issues, organized the "Digital Rerum Novarum" conference on October 16-17, combining academic research with practical AI applications. Participants included leading experts from MIT, Microsoft, Columbia University, the UN, and major European institutions. The conference...