×
The case against LLMs in software development
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

Software industry veteran offers a critical analysis of Large Language Models and the degradation of software quality over time.

The core argument: The rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) represents a concerning shift in computing, where corporations prioritize profit over software quality and user experience.

Historical context: Earlier software development emphasized different priorities and characteristics compared to today’s landscape:

  • Programs were faster and more efficient despite limited hardware capabilities
  • Quality control was paramount due to the difficulty of distributing patches
  • Software was typically standalone, purchasable, and didn’t require internet connectivity
  • Applications were simpler, focused on specific use cases, and supported multiple hardware architectures
  • Independent developers could create meaningful applications with limited resources

Current state of technology: Major tech companies have invested heavily in AI and LLM technology, creating significant market pressure:

  • Every major tech company, including Google, Microsoft, Amazon, NVIDIA, AMD, and Apple, has positioned themselves as “AI-first” by the end of 2024
  • Traditional services like Google Search and Windows have deteriorated in quality while companies focus on AI integration
  • The substantial financial investments in LLM technology make it unlikely that companies will abandon this direction, regardless of effectiveness

Technical concerns about LLMs: Several fundamental issues exist with current LLM implementation:

  • Systems are slow, expensive, and non-deterministic by design
  • Results can be inconsistent and unreliable
  • The technology represents an abstraction layer between users and computing functions
  • Environmental impact of massive data center requirements raises sustainability concerns

Generational impact: The normalization of poor software quality could have lasting effects:

  • Younger users who have never experienced better alternatives may accept subpar performance as normal
  • Growing dependency on LLM tools could reduce understanding of fundamental computing concepts
  • Future generations might never experience deterministic software behavior

Industry implications: The focus on LLMs reflects broader changes in the technology sector:

  • Competition has diminished across operating systems, search engines, and mobile platforms
  • Investment returns often trump technical merit in determining which technologies succeed
  • Companies are positioning LLMs as intermediaries for all computer interactions

Looking ahead: The momentum behind LLM technology, combined with massive corporate investments, suggests this trend will continue despite technical limitations:

  • The technology sector’s consolidation means few alternatives exist
  • Environmental and computational costs may continue to rise
  • Individual resistance options are limited to personal choice in software usage and development practices

Market realities and resistance: While the trajectory seems set due to massive financial investments, individual choices remain important:

  • Some developers and users are actively choosing to avoid LLM integration in their work
  • Small-scale resistance through personal software choices continues
  • The future impact of this technology on computing, the economy, and the environment remains uncertain
LLMs are everything that it wrong in the world of computing

Recent News

7 ways to optimize your business for ChatGPT recommendations

Companies must adapt their digital strategy with specific expertise, consistent information across platforms, and authoritative content to appear in AI-powered recommendation results.

Robin Williams’ daughter Zelda slams OpenAI’s Ghibli-style images amid artistic and ethical concerns

Robin Williams' daughter condemns OpenAI's AI-generated Ghibli-style images, highlighting both environmental costs and the contradiction with Miyazaki's well-documented opposition to artificial intelligence in creative work.

AI search tools provide wrong answers up to 60% of the time despite growing adoption

Independent testing reveals AI search tools frequently provide incorrect information, with error rates ranging from 37% to 94% across major platforms despite their growing popularity as Google alternatives.