back
Get SIGNAL/NOISE in your inbox daily

In the field of artificial intelligence there is often much confusion and misuse of terminology, particularly around the distinctions between narrow AI, artificial general intelligence (AGI), and artificial superintelligence (ASI).

The definitional challenge: Clear definitions are essential for meaningful discussion and understanding of artificial intelligence technologies and capabilities.

  • Precise terminology helps avoid miscommunication and ensures people are discussing the same concepts when debating AI developments
  • Without agreed-upon definitions, there is a risk of people talking past each other or making inaccurate comparisons
  • Technical and legal definitions often differ from casual societal usage of AI-related terms

Key distinctions matter: The differences between AI, AGI, and ASI represent fundamental technological and capability gaps that should not be conflated.

  • AI refers to narrow artificial intelligence systems designed for specific tasks
  • AGI describes hypothetical future systems with human-level intelligence across all domains
  • ASI represents a theoretical superintelligent AI that would far exceed human cognitive capabilities
  • Each term represents a distinct level of technological achievement and capability

Current state of confusion: There is growing concern about the intentional blurring of lines between these distinct concepts.

  • Some companies and individuals are deliberately obscuring the boundaries between current AI capabilities and future possibilities
  • Marketing materials and public statements often fail to distinguish between narrow AI and more advanced concepts like AGI
  • This confusion can lead to unrealistic expectations and misunderstanding of current technological capabilities

Timeline predictions: Claims about the imminent arrival of AGI or ASI deserve careful scrutiny.

  • Many predictions about AGI and ASI development timelines lack scientific rigor
  • Historical predictions about advanced AI capabilities have consistently proven premature
  • The complexity of developing human-level or superhuman AI is often underestimated

Critical analysis needed: The technology sector would benefit from increased precision in how it discusses and defines different levels of artificial intelligence capability.

Recent Stories

Oct 17, 2025

DOE fusion roadmap targets 2030s commercial deployment as AI drives $9B investment

The Department of Energy has released a new roadmap targeting commercial-scale fusion power deployment by the mid-2030s, though the plan lacks specific funding commitments and relies on scientific breakthroughs that have eluded researchers for decades. The strategy emphasizes public-private partnerships and positions AI as both a research tool and motivation for developing fusion energy to meet data centers' growing electricity demands. The big picture: The DOE's roadmap aims to "deliver the public infrastructure that supports the fusion private sector scale up in the 2030s," but acknowledges it cannot commit to specific funding levels and remains subject to Congressional appropriations. Why...

Oct 17, 2025

Tying it all together: Credo’s purple cables power the $4B AI data center boom

Credo, a Silicon Valley semiconductor company specializing in data center cables and chips, has seen its stock price more than double this year to $143.61, following a 245% surge in 2024. The company's signature purple cables, which cost between $300-$500 each, have become essential infrastructure for AI data centers, positioning Credo to capitalize on the trillion-dollar AI infrastructure expansion as hyperscalers like Amazon, Microsoft, and Elon Musk's xAI rapidly build out massive computing facilities. What you should know: Credo's active electrical cables (AECs) are becoming indispensable for connecting the massive GPU clusters required for AI training and inference. The company...

Oct 17, 2025

Vatican launches Latin American AI network for human development

The Vatican hosted a two-day conference bringing together 50 global experts to explore how artificial intelligence can advance peace, social justice, and human development. The event launched the Latin American AI Network for Integral Human Development and established principles for ethical AI governance that prioritize human dignity over technological advancement. What you should know: The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, the Vatican's research body for social issues, organized the "Digital Rerum Novarum" conference on October 16-17, combining academic research with practical AI applications. Participants included leading experts from MIT, Microsoft, Columbia University, the UN, and major European institutions. The conference...