A new study reveals a surprising gap between people’s stated preferences for human-created content and their actual consumption behaviors when it comes to AI-generated stories. This discrepancy highlights important questions about the future economic impact of AI on creative industries, as consumers may claim to value human creativity while their spending and engagement patterns suggest otherwise.
The big picture: Research shows that while people explicitly prefer and rate human-authored stories more highly than AI-generated ones, their willingness to invest time and money in reading these stories doesn’t differ based on perceived authorship.
Key details: Researchers used ChatGPT-4o to generate a short story in the style of acclaimed fiction author Jason Brown, then presented it to a nationally representative sample of over 650 participants.
- Half the participants were correctly told the story was AI-generated, while the other half were led to believe it was written by a human author.
- The experiment measured quality ratings across dimensions like predictability and emotional engagement, along with participants’ willingness to sacrifice compensation or time to continue reading.
What they found: Participants who knew they were reading AI-generated content rated the story more negatively across multiple dimensions including predictability, authenticity, and evocativeness.
- These findings align with a growing body of research showing bias against AI-created content in various creative domains including visual art, music, and poetry.
The contradiction: Despite lower quality ratings, participants demonstrated identical behaviors regardless of the story’s labeled authorship.
- Participants were willing to spend the same amount of money and time to finish reading the story whether they believed it was human or AI-written.
- The average reading time for the AI-labeled story was not significantly different from the human-labeled version.
Behind the numbers: Almost 40% of participants claimed they would have paid less for AI-written content, revealing a significant gap between people’s stated preferences and their actual consumer behavior.
Why this matters: This discrepancy between perception and behavior has profound implications for creative industries employing millions worldwide, suggesting consumers might not actually alter their consumption patterns as AI-generated content becomes more prevalent.
Recent Stories
DOE fusion roadmap targets 2030s commercial deployment as AI drives $9B investment
The Department of Energy has released a new roadmap targeting commercial-scale fusion power deployment by the mid-2030s, though the plan lacks specific funding commitments and relies on scientific breakthroughs that have eluded researchers for decades. The strategy emphasizes public-private partnerships and positions AI as both a research tool and motivation for developing fusion energy to meet data centers' growing electricity demands. The big picture: The DOE's roadmap aims to "deliver the public infrastructure that supports the fusion private sector scale up in the 2030s," but acknowledges it cannot commit to specific funding levels and remains subject to Congressional appropriations. Why...
Oct 17, 2025Tying it all together: Credo’s purple cables power the $4B AI data center boom
Credo, a Silicon Valley semiconductor company specializing in data center cables and chips, has seen its stock price more than double this year to $143.61, following a 245% surge in 2024. The company's signature purple cables, which cost between $300-$500 each, have become essential infrastructure for AI data centers, positioning Credo to capitalize on the trillion-dollar AI infrastructure expansion as hyperscalers like Amazon, Microsoft, and Elon Musk's xAI rapidly build out massive computing facilities. What you should know: Credo's active electrical cables (AECs) are becoming indispensable for connecting the massive GPU clusters required for AI training and inference. The company...
Oct 17, 2025Vatican launches Latin American AI network for human development
The Vatican hosted a two-day conference bringing together 50 global experts to explore how artificial intelligence can advance peace, social justice, and human development. The event launched the Latin American AI Network for Integral Human Development and established principles for ethical AI governance that prioritize human dignity over technological advancement. What you should know: The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, the Vatican's research body for social issues, organized the "Digital Rerum Novarum" conference on October 16-17, combining academic research with practical AI applications. Participants included leading experts from MIT, Microsoft, Columbia University, the UN, and major European institutions. The conference...