A new analysis challenges the widely cited claim that U.S. states have proposed over 1,000 AI-related bills this year, finding that the vast majority either don’t actually regulate AI or wouldn’t meaningfully impact innovation. The findings come as Congress debates whether to impose a 10-year moratorium on state AI regulation, with the inflated bill count serving as a key argument for federal preemption.
What the analysis found: Independent researcher Steven Adler’s breakdown of the supposed “1,000+” state AI bills reveals significant mischaracterization of the legislative landscape.
- Roughly 40% of the bills categorized as “AI-related” don’t actually focus on artificial intelligence regulation.
- About 90% of genuinely AI-focused bills don’t impose specific requirements on AI developers, with some even boosting the industry.
- Given that roughly 80% of proposed state bills typically don’t become law, the headline numbers dramatically overstate actual regulatory impact.
Why this matters: The inflated bill count has become central to Congressional arguments for stripping states of AI regulatory authority through federal preemption measures.
- Critics of state regulation have used the “1,000+” figure to suggest a chaotic patchwork of conflicting rules that would stifle innovation.
- The analysis suggests a more accurate count would be around 40 bills per year that meaningfully affect frontier AI development, most of which won’t become law.
The big picture: The debate reflects broader tensions between federal and state approaches to emerging technology regulation.
- Proponents of federal preemption argue that inconsistent state rules create compliance burdens for AI companies.
- However, the analysis suggests these concerns may be based on misleading statistics rather than actual regulatory conflicts.
What’s next: Adler calls for critics to identify specific contradictions between state laws rather than relying on aggregate bill counts to make their case.
- The researcher provides detailed examples and continued analysis on his Substack to support the findings.
- The debate over state versus federal AI regulation authority continues as part of broader Congressional technology policy discussions.
Recent Stories
DOE fusion roadmap targets 2030s commercial deployment as AI drives $9B investment
The Department of Energy has released a new roadmap targeting commercial-scale fusion power deployment by the mid-2030s, though the plan lacks specific funding commitments and relies on scientific breakthroughs that have eluded researchers for decades. The strategy emphasizes public-private partnerships and positions AI as both a research tool and motivation for developing fusion energy to meet data centers' growing electricity demands. The big picture: The DOE's roadmap aims to "deliver the public infrastructure that supports the fusion private sector scale up in the 2030s," but acknowledges it cannot commit to specific funding levels and remains subject to Congressional appropriations. Why...
Oct 17, 2025Tying it all together: Credo’s purple cables power the $4B AI data center boom
Credo, a Silicon Valley semiconductor company specializing in data center cables and chips, has seen its stock price more than double this year to $143.61, following a 245% surge in 2024. The company's signature purple cables, which cost between $300-$500 each, have become essential infrastructure for AI data centers, positioning Credo to capitalize on the trillion-dollar AI infrastructure expansion as hyperscalers like Amazon, Microsoft, and Elon Musk's xAI rapidly build out massive computing facilities. What you should know: Credo's active electrical cables (AECs) are becoming indispensable for connecting the massive GPU clusters required for AI training and inference. The company...
Oct 17, 2025Vatican launches Latin American AI network for human development
The Vatican hosted a two-day conference bringing together 50 global experts to explore how artificial intelligence can advance peace, social justice, and human development. The event launched the Latin American AI Network for Integral Human Development and established principles for ethical AI governance that prioritize human dignity over technological advancement. What you should know: The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, the Vatican's research body for social issues, organized the "Digital Rerum Novarum" conference on October 16-17, combining academic research with practical AI applications. Participants included leading experts from MIT, Microsoft, Columbia University, the UN, and major European institutions. The conference...