×
Paul McCartney calls on UK government to reconsider AI copyright law
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

Sir Paul McCartney warns that proposed UK copyright law changes could enable AI companies to exploit artists’ work without proper compensation.

The core issue: The UK government is considering copyright law changes that would allow AI developers to use creators’ online content for model training, with creators having to actively opt out rather than opt in.

  • McCartney argues this could make it impossible for musicians and artists to earn a living from their work
  • The proposed changes would permit AI companies to use online material for text and data mining without respecting existing copyright protections
  • Artists would need to individually notify thousands of AI providers to opt out of having their content used

Artist concerns and implications: The music industry fears these changes could fundamentally undermine creative professionals’ ability to control and monetize their work.

  • Young artists could find themselves creating content they neither own nor profit from
  • The current proposal puts the burden on creators to protect their work rather than on AI companies to obtain permission
  • UK Music, an industry body, warns these changes pose significant risks to the £120 billion creative sector

Government’s position: Officials maintain they are working to balance innovation with creator protection.

  • The government emphasizes its commitment to providing “real control” and transparency for creators
  • Officials say they are actively seeking input from the music industry before moving forward
  • The consultation aims to create legal certainty while maintaining appropriate data access for AI developers

Alternative proposals: A competing approach is gaining traction in legislative circles.

  • Baroness Kidron is introducing a proposal in the House of Lords for an opt-in system
  • This would require AI companies to obtain permission before using artists’ content
  • Advocates argue this better protects creators’ rights while still enabling AI development

The AI paradox: McCartney’s own experience with AI technology highlights the complex relationship between artificial intelligence and artistic creation.

  • In 2023, McCartney and Ringo Starr used AI to complete “Now and Then,” featuring John Lennon’s vocals from an old demo
  • The song received Grammy and Brit award nominations, demonstrating AI’s potential for positive creative applications
  • This success contrasts with concerns about unauthorized AI use of artistic content

Looking ahead: The outcome of this legislative debate could set important precedents for how AI companies interact with creative content in the digital age, potentially influencing similar policies worldwide while raising fundamental questions about the balance between technological innovation and artistic rights.

Sir Paul McCartney: Don't let AI rip off musicians

Recent News

Big Tech’s AI spending spree—and a potential Microsoft-OpenAI rift—is only just beginning

Major tech firms are committing hundreds of billions to build proprietary AI infrastructure as partnerships show signs of strain.

Verizon launches AI Connect to power scalable workloads for enterprises

New enterprise-focused platform aims to help companies deploy and manage AI workloads across distributed networks.

This AI-powered spice dispenser thinks it can help rookie home cooks

Smart kitchen gadget aims to automate seasoning with AI, but requires proprietary spice capsules and ongoing subscription costs.