The arrival of AI avatars in courtrooms highlights the legal system’s unprepared state for handling artificially generated representations in formal proceedings. A recent incident in New York’s Supreme Court Appellate Division demonstrates how judicial authorities are drawing firm boundaries around AI use in legal settings, particularly when it involves misrepresentation or could potentially undermine court processes.
What happened: A plaintiff in an employment dispute attempted to use an AI-generated avatar to present arguments before a New York appeals court, prompting an immediate shutdown by the presiding justice.
- Jerome Dewald, representing himself without an attorney, submitted what appeared to be a video of a young man in professional attire to deliver his argument before a panel of five justices.
- Justice Sallie Manzanet-Daniels halted the presentation within seconds after discovering the “person” on screen was actually an AI-generated avatar rather than a real attorney or the plaintiff himself.
The plaintiff’s explanation: Dewald claimed he created the avatar to deliver a more polished presentation than he believed he could personally provide.
- He told The Associated Press he had applied for permission to play a prerecorded video but hadn’t explicitly disclosed that it would feature an AI-generated speaker.
- Dewald initially attempted to create a digital replica of himself but was unable to accomplish this before the hearing date.
The court’s reaction: Judges responded with immediate concern about being misled about the nature of the presentation.
- “I don’t appreciate being misled,” Justice Manzanet-Daniels stated before ordering the video shut off and allowing Dewald to continue his argument conventionally.
- Dewald later submitted a formal apology to the court, acknowledging that his actions had upset the judges.
The bigger picture: This incident represents the latest in a series of AI missteps in legal settings as the technology finds its way into traditional professional domains.
- In June 2023, two attorneys and their law firm were each fined $5,000 after using an AI tool for legal research that resulted in citations of fictitious legal cases.
- These incidents highlight the growing tension between technological innovation and the legal system’s need for authenticity, transparency, and established protocols.
Recent Stories
DOE fusion roadmap targets 2030s commercial deployment as AI drives $9B investment
The Department of Energy has released a new roadmap targeting commercial-scale fusion power deployment by the mid-2030s, though the plan lacks specific funding commitments and relies on scientific breakthroughs that have eluded researchers for decades. The strategy emphasizes public-private partnerships and positions AI as both a research tool and motivation for developing fusion energy to meet data centers' growing electricity demands. The big picture: The DOE's roadmap aims to "deliver the public infrastructure that supports the fusion private sector scale up in the 2030s," but acknowledges it cannot commit to specific funding levels and remains subject to Congressional appropriations. Why...
Oct 17, 2025Tying it all together: Credo’s purple cables power the $4B AI data center boom
Credo, a Silicon Valley semiconductor company specializing in data center cables and chips, has seen its stock price more than double this year to $143.61, following a 245% surge in 2024. The company's signature purple cables, which cost between $300-$500 each, have become essential infrastructure for AI data centers, positioning Credo to capitalize on the trillion-dollar AI infrastructure expansion as hyperscalers like Amazon, Microsoft, and Elon Musk's xAI rapidly build out massive computing facilities. What you should know: Credo's active electrical cables (AECs) are becoming indispensable for connecting the massive GPU clusters required for AI training and inference. The company...
Oct 17, 2025Vatican launches Latin American AI network for human development
The Vatican hosted a two-day conference bringing together 50 global experts to explore how artificial intelligence can advance peace, social justice, and human development. The event launched the Latin American AI Network for Integral Human Development and established principles for ethical AI governance that prioritize human dignity over technological advancement. What you should know: The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, the Vatican's research body for social issues, organized the "Digital Rerum Novarum" conference on October 16-17, combining academic research with practical AI applications. Participants included leading experts from MIT, Microsoft, Columbia University, the UN, and major European institutions. The conference...