×
Nielsen: Consumers find AI-generated advertising annoying, boring and confusing
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

Increasing adoption of AI-generated video advertising is facing significant consumer pushback, as revealed in new research highlighting a disconnect between industry enthusiasm and viewer reception.

Key findings: NielsenIQ’s comprehensive research demonstrates that consumers can readily identify AI-generated video advertisements and generally respond negatively to them.

  • Viewers consistently describe AI-generated ads as more “annoying,” “boring,” and “confusing” compared to traditional advertising
  • Even high-quality AI-generated content fails to create lasting impressions with viewers
  • Low-quality AI advertisements, while successful at communicating brand associations, create cognitive strain for viewers

Technical analysis: The research employed multiple evaluation methods to assess consumer responses to AI-generated advertising content.

  • NielsenIQ utilized surveys, eye tracking, and implicit response time measurements to gather data
  • The study revealed that AI-generated content creates a “dissonance” in viewers’ minds
  • Consumers demonstrated sensitivity to advertising authenticity at both conscious and subconscious levels

Brand impact: The use of AI-generated content in advertising campaigns may have unintended negative consequences for brands.

  • AI-generated ads risk damaging brand authenticity, a crucial factor in marketing effectiveness
  • The “negative halo effect” from AI-generated content could extend beyond individual campaigns
  • Major brands like Coca-Cola and Toys R Us have already faced controversy over their AI-generated advertising content

Industry investment: Despite consumer skepticism, the marketing industry continues to make substantial investments in AI technology.

  • Advertising agencies are committing hundreds of millions of dollars to develop AI capabilities
  • Brands are increasingly incorporating AI-generated content into major campaigns
  • The term “slop” has emerged as a negative descriptor for AI-generated creative content

Silver linings: The research reveals some positive aspects of AI-generated advertising, despite overall consumer resistance.

  • AI effectively communicates intended brand associations, even in lower-quality executions
  • The technology shows promise for early-stage creative development, including ideation and storyboarding
  • Future improvements in AI technology may address current limitations in realism and viewer engagement

Looking ahead: While AI technology will likely continue to evolve and improve, current research suggests marketers should carefully consider their approach to AI-generated video content, potentially limiting its use to behind-the-scenes applications rather than customer-facing advertisements until the technology matures further and consumer acceptance grows.

Consumers call AI-generated video ads annoying, confusing, per NIQ

Recent News

7 ways to optimize your business for ChatGPT recommendations

Companies must adapt their digital strategy with specific expertise, consistent information across platforms, and authoritative content to appear in AI-powered recommendation results.

Robin Williams’ daughter Zelda slams OpenAI’s Ghibli-style images amid artistic and ethical concerns

Robin Williams' daughter condemns OpenAI's AI-generated Ghibli-style images, highlighting both environmental costs and the contradiction with Miyazaki's well-documented opposition to artificial intelligence in creative work.

AI search tools provide wrong answers up to 60% of the time despite growing adoption

Independent testing reveals AI search tools frequently provide incorrect information, with error rates ranging from 37% to 94% across major platforms despite their growing popularity as Google alternatives.