The U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission has proposed sweeping policy changes aimed at countering China’s economic and technological influence, marking a significant shift toward a more confrontational stance in bilateral relations.
Core recommendations: The commission’s annual report to Congress outlines 32 specific policy proposals designed to fundamentally reshape U.S.-China economic and technological engagement.
- A key proposal calls for revoking China’s permanent normal trade relations status, effectively ending bilateral free trade privileges
- The commission advocates for targeted import restrictions on advanced technologies from China, particularly focusing on autonomous humanoid robotics
- Recommendations include establishing restrictions on U.S. investments in Chinese technology companies and strengthening existing export controls
Technology race concerns: The commission emphasizes the critical importance of maintaining U.S. technological supremacy, particularly in artificial intelligence development.
- Proposals include creating a Manhattan Project-style initiative to accelerate U.S. artificial general intelligence (AGI) development
- The commission frames AI development as a strategic competition, suggesting significant government investment is necessary to prevent China from achieving technological dominance
- Current administration policies, including the “small yard, high fence” approach to technology restrictions, are criticized as insufficient
Strategic alliances: The report emphasizes the importance of building international coalitions to effectively counter China’s influence.
- Recommendations stress the need for coordinated action with U.S. allies despite historical challenges in maintaining these relationships
- The commission advocates for a unified approach to technology controls and trade restrictions among partner nations
- Multilateral cooperation is viewed as essential for implementing effective economic and technological containment strategies
Policy rationale: The commission presents its recommendations as a response to observed patterns in Chinese behavior rather than recent political sentiment.
- Commissioners emphasize that their hawkish stance predates current anti-China sentiment in Washington
- The breakdown in bilateral dialogue is attributed to unilateral actions by China
- The report suggests that China’s global conduct under Xi Jinping’s leadership necessitates a more assertive U.S. response
Strategic implications: While these recommendations represent a significant escalation in U.S.-China policy, questions remain about their potential economic impact and implementation feasibility, particularly given the deep economic interdependence between the two nations and the potential for retaliatory measures from Beijing.
What an Even More Hawkish China Policy Could Look Like