×
New ‘Open Weight Definition’ seeks to clarify the real difference between open- and closed-source AI models
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

The Open Source Alliance has introduced a draft Open Weight Definition (OWD) to standardize and clarify the relationship between open and closed-source AI models.

Core initiative: The Open Weight Definition aims to establish clear guidelines for AI model accessibility while protecting essential freedoms of software use and sharing.

  • The definition allows users to download and deploy AI technologies without charge or permission requirements
  • This framework maintains two of the four essential freedoms of free software: the ability to use and share, though not necessarily to study or modify models
  • The approach is designed to lower barriers to entry for vendors who cannot yet meet full open source requirements

Key distinctions: The OWD creates important clarifications between truly open source AI and models that share limited or no data.

  • Previously, terms like “open source” and “open weight” were often used interchangeably despite significant differences
  • The definition helps distinguish between fully open models and those distributed without reproduction essentials
  • Clear labeling and responsible use guidelines ensure users understand model limitations and available freedoms

Expert perspectives: Industry leaders emphasize the importance of a pragmatic, disaggregated approach to AI openness.

  • Amanda Brock, CEO at OpenUK, supports defining levels of openness across different AI components rather than attempting to create a single comprehensive definition
  • The approach acknowledges that legal and privacy constraints may affect data accessibility without compromising the broader goal of openness
  • Sam Johnston, convenor of the Open Source Alliance, highlights how open weight models serve as essential tools for innovation

Practical implications: The framework creates a balanced approach while acknowledging certain trade-offs.

  • Users maintain limited opportunities to study and modify models through observation and fine-tuning
  • Challenges remain in addressing ethical issues related to fairness and bias in training data
  • The inability to fully modify or retrain models is considered an acceptable compromise for many applications

Looking ahead: The introduction of the Open Weight Definition represents a significant step toward creating a more collaborative AI ecosystem where proprietary and open-source solutions can coexist effectively, though questions remain about how this framework will evolve as AI technology continues to advance and new challenges emerge.

Open Weight Definition Adds Balance To Open Source AI Integrity

Recent News

Microsoft and OpenAI reshape partnership allowing rival cloud services for AI model training and deployment

Microsoft eases OpenAI partnership terms while maintaining influence, allowing the AI firm to forge new cloud computing alliances.

USAII brings AI workforce upskilling certification programs to TechHR Pulse Mumbai 2025

HR leaders gather to explore AI training solutions as companies struggle to upskill their workforce at scale.

Physical AI merging intelligence and robotics to revolutionize real-world interactions

By combining machine learning with advanced mechanics, robots are gaining unprecedented ability to handle unpredictable physical tasks that previously required human dexterity.