A new research initiative aims to develop AI safety benchmark environments that incorporate universal human values, led by Roland Pihlakas as part of AI Safety Camp 10.
The core concept: The project seeks to map universal human values to concrete AI safety concepts and create testing environments that can evaluate AI systems’ alignment with these values.
- The research acknowledges fundamental asymmetries between AI and human cooperation, particularly in how goals can be programmed into AI but not humans
- The initiative builds upon existing anthropological research on cross-cultural human values
- The project will utilize multi-agent, multi-objective environments to test AI systems
Key technical components: The implementation will leverage an extended version of DeepMind‘s gridworlds framework, enhanced for multi-agent and multi-objective scenarios.
- The framework is compatible with industry-standard PettingZoo and Gym APIs
- Multiple existing benchmarks have already validated the framework’s effectiveness
- The system allows for both simple gridworld environments and potential integration with language models
Implementation approach: The project will follow a structured development process to ensure comprehensive coverage of human values.
- Step 1: Map universal human values to specific AI safety concepts
- Step 2: Design relevant benchmark environments
- Step 3: Implement environments using the extended framework
- Step 4: Test and validate using standard reinforcement learning algorithms
- Step 5: Document findings and prepare academic publications
Technical considerations: The project emphasizes balancing multiple human values rather than simple trade-offs.
- Non-linear utility functions will be used to transform rewards before summation
- The approach acknowledges that humans prefer balanced outcomes across objectives
- Economic concepts like diminishing returns and marginal utility will be incorporated
Risk mitigation: The project focuses on benchmark development rather than advancing AI capabilities.
- The emphasis remains on outer alignment while considering inner alignment implications
- Multiple objectives may help prevent overfitting to single random objectives
- The framework allows for controlled testing environments to minimize unintended consequences
Looking ahead: The varying ambition levels of the project demonstrate its scalability and potential impact on AI safety testing standards.
- The most ambitious version aims for comprehensive value mapping and widespread adoption
- The minimum viable product would map select values and develop proof-of-concept environments
- All outcomes will contribute to foundational work in AI safety benchmarking
Building AI safety benchmark environments on themes of universal human values