National conservative speakers at the recent NatCon conference overwhelmingly opposed artificial intelligence development, with some calling for a “holy war” against AI developers. The hostility was so intense that it prompted discussions about unlikely alliances with labor unions to resist technological change, revealing a significant ideological divide within conservative politics on AI policy.
What they’re saying: The rhetoric against AI was particularly harsh, with speakers attacking both the technology and its creators.
- Geoffrey Miller, a psychology professor at the University of New Mexico, called AI developers “betrayers of our species, traitors to our nation, apostates to our faith, and threats to our kids” during a panel titled “AI and the American Soul.”
- Miller described the AI industry as “by and large, globalist, secular, liberal, feminized transhumanists” who “explicitly want mass unemployment, they plan for UBI-based communism, and they view the human species as a biological ‘bootloader,’ as they say, for artificial superintelligence.”
- Steve Bannon warned during closing remarks: “Yes, artificial intelligence could have tremendous upsides. But you’re looking into a bottomless pit. It’s a downside that nobody understands and nobody can articulate.”
The lone dissenter: Shyam Sankar, Palantir’s chief technology officer, faced intense pushback when arguing that tech founders were as heroic as the Founding Fathers.
- Sankar was directly confronted by Miller during the conference for his pro-AI stance.
- By the end of NatCon, “no one seemed to agree with Sankar,” according to the report.
Surprising alliances: The anti-AI sentiment was strong enough to prompt calls for cooperation with traditionally liberal labor unions.
- Michael Toscano, director of the Family First Technology Initiative, argued that unions “have a long history of confronting technological change and should be treated as sources of experience and knowledge, rather than a historical dead weight force for anti-modernization.”
- Toscano suggested that if Trump brought together the right wing and unions against AI, “he would go down in history as one of America’s greatest presidents, if not the man who saved the future.”
Why this matters: The widespread opposition challenges assumptions about conservative support for American technological dominance, even when framed as competition with China.
- Speakers weren’t swayed by arguments about beating Chinese AI development or Trump’s own support for projects like Stargate.
- Toscano criticized the state’s rationale for AI acceleration, saying the message of “we must beat China and grow the economy” represents “a barren life” where Americans must “part ways with everything — including a happier future for your children and grandchildren.”
The big picture: This represents a potential fracture within conservative politics between tech-friendly and populist factions, with implications for future AI policy and regulation under conservative leadership.
Recent Stories
DOE fusion roadmap targets 2030s commercial deployment as AI drives $9B investment
The Department of Energy has released a new roadmap targeting commercial-scale fusion power deployment by the mid-2030s, though the plan lacks specific funding commitments and relies on scientific breakthroughs that have eluded researchers for decades. The strategy emphasizes public-private partnerships and positions AI as both a research tool and motivation for developing fusion energy to meet data centers' growing electricity demands. The big picture: The DOE's roadmap aims to "deliver the public infrastructure that supports the fusion private sector scale up in the 2030s," but acknowledges it cannot commit to specific funding levels and remains subject to Congressional appropriations. Why...
Oct 17, 2025Tying it all together: Credo’s purple cables power the $4B AI data center boom
Credo, a Silicon Valley semiconductor company specializing in data center cables and chips, has seen its stock price more than double this year to $143.61, following a 245% surge in 2024. The company's signature purple cables, which cost between $300-$500 each, have become essential infrastructure for AI data centers, positioning Credo to capitalize on the trillion-dollar AI infrastructure expansion as hyperscalers like Amazon, Microsoft, and Elon Musk's xAI rapidly build out massive computing facilities. What you should know: Credo's active electrical cables (AECs) are becoming indispensable for connecting the massive GPU clusters required for AI training and inference. The company...
Oct 17, 2025Vatican launches Latin American AI network for human development
The Vatican hosted a two-day conference bringing together 50 global experts to explore how artificial intelligence can advance peace, social justice, and human development. The event launched the Latin American AI Network for Integral Human Development and established principles for ethical AI governance that prioritize human dignity over technological advancement. What you should know: The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, the Vatican's research body for social issues, organized the "Digital Rerum Novarum" conference on October 16-17, combining academic research with practical AI applications. Participants included leading experts from MIT, Microsoft, Columbia University, the UN, and major European institutions. The conference...