×
Muck Rack Tackles Fake AI Journalist Profiles, Reflecting Wider Challenges Across Media
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

The journalist database Muck Rack is taking steps to address the issue of fake AI-generated writer profiles and content on its platform, reflecting a wider challenge across the media industry.

Muck Rack unverifies fake iLounge writer profiles: After being contacted by The Verge for comment, Muck Rack removed verification from two profiles of seemingly fake writers for iLounge who appeared to be publishing AI-written content.

Developing AI detection capabilities: Muck Rack spokesperson Linda Zebian said the platform is working on a model to identify signs commonly associated with fake authorship, allowing them to flag potential AI-generated writers to users.

Broader context of AI-generated content in media: This development comes amidst growing concerns about the impact of AI-generated content on the media landscape, as seen with the recent controversy surrounding the early Apple tech blog TUAW being AI-zombified with fake writer profiles and articles.

Implications for journalist databases and media credibility: As AI-powered tools become more sophisticated in generating realistic content, platforms like Muck Rack that serve as databases of verified journalists and media professionals will need to adapt their verification processes to maintain trust and credibility in an era of AI-generated fake writers and articles.

Journalist database Muck Rack is dealing with fake writers, too.

Recent News

IAG’s AI system cuts aircraft maintenance planning from weeks to minutes

The system runs millions of daily scenarios to avoid costly grounded aircraft emergencies.

Trump secures China rare earth deal while escalating AI competition

The White House frames dependency on Chinese minerals as an existential threat.

Coatue research reveals AI is creating a “great separation” between winners and losers

High-growth companies command 13x revenue multiples versus 4x for slower growers.