Microsoft’s privacy practices regarding AI training have come under scrutiny following recent misconceptions about how the company uses data from its Microsoft 365 suite of applications.
Key misunderstanding clarified: Microsoft has explicitly stated that it does not use customer data from Microsoft 365 applications to train its large language models (LLMs).
- The controversy stemmed from confusion over a default privacy setting for “optional connected experiences” in Microsoft Office
- These connected experiences enable features like online picture search and internet-based information lookup
- The setting’s disclosure language did not specifically address AI training, contributing to public confusion
Technical context: The “optional connected experiences” feature represents basic cloud connectivity functions rather than AI training capabilities.
- A Microsoft learning document from October 2024 listing various content analysis features added to the uncertainty
- The Microsoft 365 X account clarified that the setting only enables basic internet-dependent features like document co-authoring
- Frank Shaw, Microsoft’s communications head, also stepped in to address and correct the misconceptions
Industry parallels: Similar privacy concerns have emerged across the tech sector as AI development accelerates.
- Adobe recently faced comparable scrutiny when its terms of service were misinterpreted as allowing AI training on user content
- The company quickly revised its terms to explicitly state this was not the case
- Major tech companies like Meta, X, and Google do opt users into AI training by default, highlighting the contrast with Microsoft’s approach
Broader implications: These incidents reflect growing public awareness and concern about how personal data might be used in AI development.
- Users are increasingly vigilant about their data privacy rights and how their information might be used for AI training
- The misunderstandings highlight the importance of clear communication from tech companies about their data usage practices
- There’s a notable distinction between companies that do and don’t use customer data for AI training, creating potential competitive differentiation in the market
Recent Stories
DOE fusion roadmap targets 2030s commercial deployment as AI drives $9B investment
The Department of Energy has released a new roadmap targeting commercial-scale fusion power deployment by the mid-2030s, though the plan lacks specific funding commitments and relies on scientific breakthroughs that have eluded researchers for decades. The strategy emphasizes public-private partnerships and positions AI as both a research tool and motivation for developing fusion energy to meet data centers' growing electricity demands. The big picture: The DOE's roadmap aims to "deliver the public infrastructure that supports the fusion private sector scale up in the 2030s," but acknowledges it cannot commit to specific funding levels and remains subject to Congressional appropriations. Why...
Oct 17, 2025Tying it all together: Credo’s purple cables power the $4B AI data center boom
Credo, a Silicon Valley semiconductor company specializing in data center cables and chips, has seen its stock price more than double this year to $143.61, following a 245% surge in 2024. The company's signature purple cables, which cost between $300-$500 each, have become essential infrastructure for AI data centers, positioning Credo to capitalize on the trillion-dollar AI infrastructure expansion as hyperscalers like Amazon, Microsoft, and Elon Musk's xAI rapidly build out massive computing facilities. What you should know: Credo's active electrical cables (AECs) are becoming indispensable for connecting the massive GPU clusters required for AI training and inference. The company...
Oct 17, 2025Vatican launches Latin American AI network for human development
The Vatican hosted a two-day conference bringing together 50 global experts to explore how artificial intelligence can advance peace, social justice, and human development. The event launched the Latin American AI Network for Integral Human Development and established principles for ethical AI governance that prioritize human dignity over technological advancement. What you should know: The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, the Vatican's research body for social issues, organized the "Digital Rerum Novarum" conference on October 16-17, combining academic research with practical AI applications. Participants included leading experts from MIT, Microsoft, Columbia University, the UN, and major European institutions. The conference...