Massachusetts lawmaker proposes new legislation to crack down on AI use

Massachusetts State Senator Barry Finegold has introduced comprehensive legislation aimed at regulating artificial intelligence usage while promoting innovation in the state.

Key legislative components: The bill seeks to establish safety protocols and oversight mechanisms for AI development and deployment in Massachusetts.

• The proposed legislation requires AI developers to demonstrate capability to shut down AI models if misused
• Companies must publish safety protocols and undergo annual third-party audits to verify their AI systems don’t cause significant financial or physical harm
• The bill includes whistleblower protections for employees and contractors working in AI development
• The state Office of Technology Services and Security would be responsible for writing specific regulations

Strategic coordination and context: Massachusetts is part of a broader multi-state effort to create consistent AI regulations across technology-focused states.

• Finegold is working closely with California State Senator Scott Wiener on aligned regulatory approaches
• The initiative addresses a regulatory gap left by limited federal oversight of AI technology
• The legislation incorporates input from Governor Maura Healey’s AI task force, co-chaired by state economic secretary Yvonne Hao

Economic development initiatives: The bill balances regulatory oversight with measures to stimulate AI industry growth in Massachusetts.

• A new AI Innovation fund would be established to support AI startup incubation
• The state recently approved $100 million for an AI hub to be managed by the Massachusetts Technology Collaborative
• The economic secretary’s office plans to provide grants to AI entrepreneurs
• Finegold believes these guardrails will attract rather than deter AI companies

Learning from past oversight gaps: The legislation reflects lessons learned from previous technological developments and their regulation.

• Finegold specifically cited missed opportunities in social media regulation as motivation for proactive AI oversight
• The focus is on implementing “common sense reform” to ensure information accuracy and public safety

Future implications: While Massachusetts aims to position itself as a leader in responsible AI development, the success of this regulatory framework could serve as a model for other states grappling with AI oversight, though questions remain about enforcement mechanisms and the potential impact on smaller AI companies trying to enter the market.