×
Major Platforms Block Apple’s AI Crawler Amid Data Concerns
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

AI data collection faces pushback: Apple’s introduction of Applebot-Extended, a tool allowing websites to opt out of AI training data collection, has sparked a significant response from major online platforms and publishers.

  • Prominent sites including Facebook, Instagram, Craigslist, Tumblr, and several leading news outlets have chosen to block Applebot-Extended, signaling a shift in attitudes towards web crawlers and their role in AI development.
  • Website owners can prevent Applebot-Extended from accessing their content by updating their robots.txt file, a standard method for controlling web crawler access.
  • Recent analyses indicate that 6-7% of high-traffic websites are blocking Applebot-Extended, with news and media outlets leading the charge.

News industry takes a stand: The media sector appears to be at the forefront of the pushback against AI data collection, with a quarter of news websites blocking Applebot-Extended.

  • Comparatively, 53% of news sites block OpenAI’s bot, and 43% block Google-Extended, suggesting a broader trend of resistance to AI training data collection in the news industry.
  • Major publishers like The New York Times, The Financial Times, The Atlantic, Vox Media, USA Today network, and Condé Nast have all opted to block Apple’s AI crawler.
  • This widespread action reflects growing concerns among publishers about the use of their content for AI training without explicit permission or compensation.

Strategic considerations: The decision to block AI crawlers is not solely about protecting content; it also serves as a strategic move for many publishers.

  • Some media organizations are using this as leverage to potentially negotiate partnerships or licensing deals with AI companies.
  • Different publishers are adopting varied approaches, with some implementing blanket bans on all AI bots without partnerships, while others make case-by-case decisions.
  • The New York Times has taken a strong stance, arguing that scraping content for commercial purposes should require explicit permission, not just an opt-out option.

Broader implications for AI and publishing: The widespread adoption of AI bot blocking tools highlights the evolving relationship between content creators and AI companies.

  • The use of robots.txt to control AI data access has become a crucial issue for media executives and publishers, reflecting the growing importance of AI in the digital landscape.
  • This trend could potentially impact the quality and diversity of data available for AI training, possibly affecting the development of future AI models and applications.
  • The situation underscores the need for clearer guidelines and potentially new legal frameworks governing the use of online content for AI training purposes.

Industry-wide impact: The response to Applebot-Extended is indicative of a larger shift in how web content is viewed and valued in the age of AI.

  • As AI technologies become more advanced and integrated into various products and services, the data used to train these systems is increasingly seen as a valuable resource.
  • This development may lead to more formal arrangements between content creators and AI companies, potentially reshaping the economics of online publishing and AI development.
  • The actions of major publishers could inspire smaller websites and content creators to also take steps to protect their data from AI scraping.

Looking ahead: Balancing innovation and rights: The current situation highlights the complex balance between fostering AI innovation and protecting the rights and interests of content creators.

  • As AI continues to advance, finding a mutually beneficial arrangement between AI companies and content creators will be crucial for sustainable development in both sectors.
  • This may lead to new business models, such as licensing agreements for AI training data, or the development of more sophisticated content protection technologies.
  • The outcome of this ongoing debate could have far-reaching consequences for the future of AI development, online publishing, and digital content creation as a whole.
Major Sites Are Saying No to Apple’s AI Scraping

Recent News

Propaganda is everywhere, even in LLMS — here’s how to protect yourself from it

Recent tragedy spurs examination of AI chatbot safety measures after automated responses proved harmful to a teenager seeking emotional support.

How Anthropic’s Claude is changing the game for software developers

AI coding assistants now handle over 10% of software development tasks, with major tech firms reporting significant time and cost savings from their deployment.

AI-powered divergent thinking: How hallucinations help scientists achieve big breakthroughs

Meta's new AI model combines powerful performance with unusually permissive licensing terms for businesses and developers.