×
Judge Dismisses Most Claims in GitHub Copilot Copyright Lawsuit, Narrows Case
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

The copyright lawsuit against GitHub, Microsoft, and OpenAI over the AI-powered GitHub Copilot tool has been significantly narrowed, with a judge dismissing most of the claims brought by a group of developers.

Key developments in the case: Judge Jon Tigar’s ruling dealt a major setback to the developers’ lawsuit, which originally made 22 claims against the companies:

  • Nearly all of the claims were dismissed, leaving only two standing: an accusation of open-source license violation and an allegation of breach of contract.
  • The judge determined that the code allegedly copied by GitHub Copilot wasn’t similar enough to the developers’ original work to violate copyright laws.
  • Requests for punitive damages and monetary relief in the form of unjust enrichment were also dismissed.

The heart of the dispute: The lawsuit revolves around accusations that GitHub Copilot, an AI-powered coding assistant, violates copyright by suggesting code without proper attribution:

  • GitHub Copilot is powered by OpenAI’s technology and was trained on developers’ work hosted on the platform.
  • The amended complaint took issue with GitHub’s duplication detection filter, which users can toggle on or off to “detect and suppress” Copilot suggestions matching public code.
  • The developers argued that turning off the filter allows users to “receive identical code,” potentially including copyrighted work.

Analyzing the court’s decision: While this ruling significantly limits the scope of the lawsuit, it doesn’t mark the end of the legal battle:

  • The dismissal of the copyright claims with prejudice means the developers can’t refile those specific allegations.
  • However, the breach of contract and open-source license violation claims will likely continue to be litigated.
  • This case highlights the complex legal challenges surrounding AI systems trained on vast amounts of data, including copyrighted work, and the ongoing debate over fair use and attribution in the context of AI-generated content.
The developers suing over GitHub Copilot got dealt a major blow in court

Recent News

Netflix drops AI-generated poster after creator backlash

Studios face mounting pressure over AI-generated artwork as backlash grows from both artists and audiences, prompting hasty removal of promotional materials and public apologies.

ChatGPT’s water usage is 4x higher than previously estimated

Growing demand for AI computing is straining local water supplies as data centers consume billions of gallons for cooling systems.

Conservationists in the UK turn to AI to save red squirrels

AI-powered feeders help Britain's endangered red squirrels access food while diverting invasive grey squirrels to contraceptive stations.