Journalist’s AI Voice Clone Exposes Deception Risks as Technology Rapidly Evolves

A journalist’s podcast explores the deceptive potential of AI voice cloning technology, raising questions about its implications as the technology rapidly advances.

The podcast’s premise: Journalist Evan Ratliff spent a year deceiving people with an AI clone of his own voice to test the capabilities and implications of voice cloning technology:

• Ratliff, known for his technology-related stunts, used OpenAI’s GPT-4 model to create the voice clone for his new podcast, “Shell Game.”
• The AI version of Ratliff’s voice claimed to be powered by the older GPT-3 model and fabricated episode titles when asked, highlighting its potential for deception.
• Delays and the AI’s ability to rapidly recite all U.S. presidents alphabetically made it clear the voice was not human during the author’s interaction with it.

Assessing the podcast’s impact: While Ratliff’s podcast will likely entertain and provoke thought about voice cloning technology, its long-term relevance is uncertain given the rapid pace of AI advancement:

• Voice cloning is still an emerging, infant technology, and journalism aiming to raise alarms often misses the real issues that will arise as the technology evolves.
• Experts at top AI companies suggest today’s models are rudimentary compared to what’s to come, meaning the questions Ratliff raises may not remain salient in the future.
• As AI voice cloning capabilities improve, the “game” Ratliff is playing now will likely be surpassed by new, more sophisticated versions of the technology.

The broader context of AI ethics: Ratliff’s experiment highlights the ongoing debate surrounding the responsible development and use of AI technologies:

• As AI becomes more advanced and human-like, the potential for deception and misuse grows, raising ethical concerns about transparency, consent, and accountability.
• Policymakers, researchers, and tech companies are grappling with how to regulate and govern AI to mitigate risks while still encouraging innovation.
• The podcast may contribute to public awareness and discourse around these issues, but lasting solutions will require ongoing collaboration across sectors.