×
How to Choose the Right LLM for Your Business
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

Conversational AI adoption is accelerating in marketing, sales, and customer service, with over 40% of organizations already implementing this technology. However, many business leaders are unsure how to begin implementation, particularly when it comes to choosing between open-source and closed-source large language models (LLMs).

Key considerations for building conversational AI: The choice between popular LLMs like GPT-4o (OpenAI) and Llama 3 (Meta) depends on factors such as setup costs, processing costs, and specific business needs.

  • Setup costs include development and operational expenses to get the LLM running, while processing costs cover the actual expense of each conversation once the tool is live.
  • The cost-to-value ratio depends on the intended use of the LLM and the expected usage volume.
  • GPT-4o offers quicker deployment with minimal setup, while Llama 3 requires more initial investment but may provide long-term cost benefits for high-volume users.

Understanding LLM pricing models: LLMs typically use “tokens” as a basic metric for processing input and output, though the definition of tokens can vary between models.

  • GPT-4o, a closed-source model, charges $0.005 per 1,000 input tokens and $0.015 per 1,000 output tokens.
  • Llama 3, an open-source model, can be hosted on private servers or cloud infrastructure, with providers like Amazon Bedrock charging $0.00265 per 1,000 input tokens and $0.00350 per 1,000 output tokens.

Cost comparison for a benchmark conversation: Using a hypothetical conversation of 16 messages totaling 30,390 tokens, the costs were calculated for both LLMs.

  • GPT-4o: Approximately $0.16 per conversation
  • Llama 3 (on AWS Bedrock): Approximately $0.08 per conversation, not including server costs

Additional factors to consider: The decision between LLMs should take into account various aspects beyond just token costs.

  • Time to deployment: GPT-4o offers faster implementation, while Llama 3 may require weeks of setup.
  • Usage volume: High-volume users may benefit more from Llama 3’s lower per-conversation costs in the long run.
  • Control and customization: Open-source models like Llama 3 offer more control over the product and data.
  • Operational requirements: Llama 3 demands more time and resources for setup, maintenance, and infrastructure management.

Weighing the options: The choice between building in-house or using off-the-shelf solutions depends on the company’s specific needs and resources.

  • Companies planning to use conversational AI as a core service may find it worthwhile to invest in building their own solution.
  • For businesses where conversational AI is not a fundamental element of their brand, off-the-shelf products may offer a more cost-effective and efficient solution.

Looking ahead: As conversational AI continues to evolve, businesses must carefully evaluate their options based on their unique context and customer needs.

  • The rapid adoption of generative AI in various sectors indicates its growing importance in bridging communication gaps between businesses and customers.
  • Continuous assessment of LLM options and their associated costs will be crucial as the technology advances and market demands change.
What does it cost to build a conversational AI?

Recent News

Zerocam’s new mobile app completely rejects AI-tampered photos

Growing consumer demand for unprocessed, AI-free images sparks the launch of minimalist photography apps like Zerocam.

The future of software development: AI agents vs AI copilots

AI-powered coding assistants promise to slash development time and costs, but face challenges in accuracy, security, and intellectual property concerns.

AI startup Writer secures $1.9B valuation for enterprise super app

Headline: AI startup Writer raises $200M, hits $1.9B valuationExcerpt: The company's full-stack platform and industry-specific models are attracting major enterprise clients seeking customizable, secure AI solutions across departments.