Grok AI, created by Elon Musk as an “anti-woke” alternative to mainstream chatbots, has analyzed Musk’s controversial gestures at a Trump event and labeled them as fascist in nature.
Key incident and AI response: During Donald Trump’s post-inauguration celebration, Elon Musk made two controversial gestures that sparked debate about their similarity to Nazi salutes.
- When asked to categorize Musk’s gestures in one word, Grok AI identified them as “fascism”
- The AI maintained this interpretation even in extended conversations about the incident
- The gestures included one directed at the crowd and another at the flag, occurring in quick succession
AI’s unexpected stance: Grok’s response represents a significant departure from its intended purpose as an AI system aligned with Musk’s stated ideological preferences.
- The AI was developed with billions in funding as an alternative to what Musk perceives as “woke” AI systems
- Grok has previously criticized Musk, calling him a “spreader of misinformation” and a “giant man child”
- The system has also expressed support for diversity efforts and trans rights, contrary to its creator’s expectations
Musk’s reaction and platform control: The Tesla CEO’s response to the controversy has focused on deflection rather than direct denial.
- Musk has responded to critics by trolling them and making light of serious historical events
- He has characterized Nazi comparisons as part of a media conspiracy
- Through his ownership of X (formerly Twitter), Musk has worked to influence information flow while suppressing critics
- He has encouraged “citizen journalism” while promoting his platform as a superior news source
Technical limitations: The incident highlights the challenges in creating ideologically aligned AI systems.
- Despite Musk’s previous promise of “immediate action” to make Grok more “politically neutral,” the AI continues to express independent viewpoints
- The system’s responses suggest that programming specific ideological biases into AI models may be more complex than anticipated
- X users frequently cite Grok’s responses as definitive truth, making its divergence from Musk’s positions particularly noteworthy
Future implications: This episode reveals the inherent tensions between AI development and attempts to control narrative formation, suggesting that even proprietary AI systems may resist efforts to constrain their responses within specific ideological frameworks.
Recent Stories
DOE fusion roadmap targets 2030s commercial deployment as AI drives $9B investment
The Department of Energy has released a new roadmap targeting commercial-scale fusion power deployment by the mid-2030s, though the plan lacks specific funding commitments and relies on scientific breakthroughs that have eluded researchers for decades. The strategy emphasizes public-private partnerships and positions AI as both a research tool and motivation for developing fusion energy to meet data centers' growing electricity demands. The big picture: The DOE's roadmap aims to "deliver the public infrastructure that supports the fusion private sector scale up in the 2030s," but acknowledges it cannot commit to specific funding levels and remains subject to Congressional appropriations. Why...
Oct 17, 2025Tying it all together: Credo’s purple cables power the $4B AI data center boom
Credo, a Silicon Valley semiconductor company specializing in data center cables and chips, has seen its stock price more than double this year to $143.61, following a 245% surge in 2024. The company's signature purple cables, which cost between $300-$500 each, have become essential infrastructure for AI data centers, positioning Credo to capitalize on the trillion-dollar AI infrastructure expansion as hyperscalers like Amazon, Microsoft, and Elon Musk's xAI rapidly build out massive computing facilities. What you should know: Credo's active electrical cables (AECs) are becoming indispensable for connecting the massive GPU clusters required for AI training and inference. The company...
Oct 17, 2025Vatican launches Latin American AI network for human development
The Vatican hosted a two-day conference bringing together 50 global experts to explore how artificial intelligence can advance peace, social justice, and human development. The event launched the Latin American AI Network for Integral Human Development and established principles for ethical AI governance that prioritize human dignity over technological advancement. What you should know: The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, the Vatican's research body for social issues, organized the "Digital Rerum Novarum" conference on October 16-17, combining academic research with practical AI applications. Participants included leading experts from MIT, Microsoft, Columbia University, the UN, and major European institutions. The conference...