×
Google gave Gemini access to search just hours before OpenAI launched GPT Search
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

AI-powered search enters a new era: Google and OpenAI have launched competing AI-enhanced search capabilities, signaling a significant shift in how information may be accessed and processed online.

Google’s developer-focused approach: Google has integrated its search capabilities with its Gemini AI platform, targeting developers building AI applications.

  • The new feature, called “Grounding with Google Search,” allows developers to supplement their AI applications with fresh search data, complete with citations and sources.
  • The service costs $35 per 1,000 queries, reflecting the substantial computing requirements for real-time AI search.
  • Google’s system uses a “dynamic retrieval” mechanism that automatically determines when to tap into search results, scoring queries between 0 and 1 to manage costs and response times while maintaining accuracy.

OpenAI’s consumer-centric strategy: In contrast to Google’s developer-focused approach, OpenAI has launched ChatGPT Search, targeting consumers directly.

  • ChatGPT Search offers end users a way to access current information about news, sports, stocks, and weather through a conversational interface, notably without advertisements.
  • This service aims to provide synthesized answers from multiple sources, potentially changing how people find information online.

The competitive landscape: The simultaneous launches by Google and OpenAI suggest AI-powered search may evolve into a three-way race, including Microsoft through its OpenAI partnership.

  • Google maintains advantages in search infrastructure and advertising revenue, having earned $49.4 billion from search advertising in Q3 2024.
  • OpenAI has demonstrated skill in creating compelling consumer AI products.
  • Microsoft benefits from both through its multibillion-dollar OpenAI investment.

Technological and financial implications: The integration of AI with search capabilities comes with significant technological and financial considerations.

  • Running these AI systems requires massive computing resources, with OpenAI expecting to spend $5 billion on computing costs this year alone.
  • The high costs associated with these services raise questions about sustainable business models for AI-powered search.

Publisher compensation and legal challenges: The use of AI systems to access and synthesize information raises important questions about publisher compensation and content rights.

  • Both Google and OpenAI have secured licensing deals with major news organizations, though the financial terms remain private.
  • Several publishers, including The New York Times, have filed lawsuits over AI systems using their content without permission.

Potential impact on information access: The evolution of AI-powered search could fundamentally change how people find and consume information online.

  • Users may increasingly rely on AI systems to synthesize answers from multiple sources, rather than scrolling through pages of search results.
  • This shift raises questions about accuracy, the role of traditional search engines, and the potential for AI to shape information consumption patterns.

Looking ahead: Challenges and opportunities: The emergence of AI-powered search presents both challenges and opportunities for the tech industry and society at large.

  • While these systems promise more efficient and personalized information access, concerns about accuracy, bias, and the impact on traditional publishing models persist.
  • The competition between Google, OpenAI, and Microsoft may drive rapid innovation in this space, potentially leading to new paradigms in information retrieval and processing.
Google just gave its AI access to Search, hours before OpenAI launched ChatGPT Search

Recent News

Hugging Face launches powerful small AI models to run on smartphones

The new family of compact language models offers impressive performance on smartphones and edge devices while requiring fewer computational resources than larger models.

AI tools vs AI solutions: What’s the difference and why should you care?

MIT study suggests CIOs should adopt a two-tier strategy for AI implementation, differentiating between productivity tools and business-case-driven solutions.

AI writing showdown: Apple Intelligence vs Grammarly in 5 key tests

A head-to-head comparison reveals Apple Intelligence's edge in preserving natural writing styles, while Grammarly excels in strict grammatical adherence.