US District Judge Amit Mehta has ruled that Google can keep Chrome and continue paying browser developers for default search placement, but must share search index data with competitors at marginal cost. The decision, stemming from Google’s antitrust case, represents a significantly lighter penalty than the Department of Justice had sought, with the judge citing AI search engines as a growing competitive threat that could naturally erode Google’s market dominance.
The big picture: Mehta’s 230-page ruling reflects his belief that generative AI companies are already better positioned to compete with Google than traditional search engines have been in decades.
- “The money flowing into this space, and how quickly it has arrived, is astonishing,” Mehta wrote, noting that AI firms already possess both the financial resources and technology to challenge Google’s search monopoly.
- The judge rejected forcing Google to sell Chrome as “incredibly messy and highly risky,” despite multi-billion-dollar bids from companies like Perplexity, an AI-powered search engine.
What Google must do: The approved remedies focus primarily on helping competitors build their own comprehensive search indexes.
- Google must provide search-index data to rivals at “marginal cost” to help them create indexes matching Google’s scale, though competitors will still need to build their own web crawlers and processing systems.
- For five years, Google must offer syndicated search results to competitors on “ordinary commercial terms” while they develop their own capabilities.
- The company must publicly disclose material changes to its ads auctions, targeting a pattern of undisclosed price increases revealed during the trial.
What Google gets to keep: The judge preserved several key aspects of Google’s current business model.
- Google can continue its estimated $20 billion annual payments to Apple for Safari default search placement, with only exclusivity arrangements banned.
- The company retains ownership of both Chrome and Android, with Mehta writing that forced divestiture “does not fit the wrong.”
- Revenue-sharing deals with browser developers like Mozilla and Opera can continue, which the judge noted prevents depriving independent browsers of critical funding.
Market reaction: Industry analysts view the ruling as favorable to Google’s existing operations.
- MoffettNathanson, a market research firm, called it a “slap-on-the-wrist ruling” and “a home run for the status quo” in a research note.
- Mozilla CEO Laura Chambers expressed relief on LinkedIn, finding it “encouraging to see the Court recognize the risk of unintended consequences when trying to improve search competition.”
What they’re saying: Both sides indicated they’re reviewing the decision for potential next steps.
- “Now the Court has imposed limits on how we distribute Google services, and will require us to share Search data with rivals,” said Lee-Anne Mulholland, Google’s vice president for regulatory affairs, while noting privacy concerns.
- The Justice Department said the ruling “recognizes the need for remedies that will pry open the market for general search services, which has been frozen in place for over a decade.”
Why this matters: The relatively light penalties suggest courts may view AI as a natural market corrective rather than requiring heavy regulatory intervention, potentially setting precedent for how antitrust cases handle rapidly evolving technology sectors where new competitors can emerge quickly.
Recent Stories
DOE fusion roadmap targets 2030s commercial deployment as AI drives $9B investment
The Department of Energy has released a new roadmap targeting commercial-scale fusion power deployment by the mid-2030s, though the plan lacks specific funding commitments and relies on scientific breakthroughs that have eluded researchers for decades. The strategy emphasizes public-private partnerships and positions AI as both a research tool and motivation for developing fusion energy to meet data centers' growing electricity demands. The big picture: The DOE's roadmap aims to "deliver the public infrastructure that supports the fusion private sector scale up in the 2030s," but acknowledges it cannot commit to specific funding levels and remains subject to Congressional appropriations. Why...
Oct 17, 2025Tying it all together: Credo’s purple cables power the $4B AI data center boom
Credo, a Silicon Valley semiconductor company specializing in data center cables and chips, has seen its stock price more than double this year to $143.61, following a 245% surge in 2024. The company's signature purple cables, which cost between $300-$500 each, have become essential infrastructure for AI data centers, positioning Credo to capitalize on the trillion-dollar AI infrastructure expansion as hyperscalers like Amazon, Microsoft, and Elon Musk's xAI rapidly build out massive computing facilities. What you should know: Credo's active electrical cables (AECs) are becoming indispensable for connecting the massive GPU clusters required for AI training and inference. The company...
Oct 17, 2025Vatican launches Latin American AI network for human development
The Vatican hosted a two-day conference bringing together 50 global experts to explore how artificial intelligence can advance peace, social justice, and human development. The event launched the Latin American AI Network for Integral Human Development and established principles for ethical AI governance that prioritize human dignity over technological advancement. What you should know: The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, the Vatican's research body for social issues, organized the "Digital Rerum Novarum" conference on October 16-17, combining academic research with practical AI applications. Participants included leading experts from MIT, Microsoft, Columbia University, the UN, and major European institutions. The conference...