×
Go small or go home: SLMs outperform LLMs with test-time scaling
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

The rapid advancement in language model technology has led to surprising discoveries about the capabilities of smaller models. A recent study by Shanghai AI Laboratory demonstrates that Small Language Models (SLMs) can surpass the performance of much larger models in specific reasoning tasks when equipped with appropriate test-time scaling techniques.

Core findings: Test-time scaling (TTS) techniques enable a 1 billion parameter language model to outperform a 405 billion parameter model on complex mathematical benchmarks, challenging conventional assumptions about model size and performance.

  • The study demonstrates that strategic application of compute resources during inference can dramatically enhance small model performance
  • Researchers achieved these results using various TTS methods, including “best-of-N” sampling and more sophisticated search-based approaches
  • The findings suggest that model size isn’t always the determining factor in performance

Technical methodology: Test-time scaling encompasses both internal methods, where models are trained to generate extended reasoning chains, and external methods that leverage separate components to enhance performance.

  • External TTS utilizes a policy model for answer generation and a process reward model (PRM) for evaluation
  • The system employs different sampling methods, from simple “best-of-N” selection to more complex beam search and diverse verifier tree search (DVTS)
  • These techniques allow existing models to be repurposed for reasoning tasks without additional training

Performance factors: The effectiveness of different TTS strategies varies based on model size and problem complexity.

  • Small models (under 7B parameters) perform better with beam search for difficult problems
  • Medium-sized models (7B-32B parameters) benefit from diverse tree search for simpler tasks
  • Larger models (over 72B parameters) achieve optimal results with best-of-N sampling across all difficulty levels

Breakthrough results: The research demonstrated remarkable achievements in computational efficiency and performance.

  • A Llama-3.2-3B model outperformed Llama-3.1-405B on complex math benchmarks
  • A 500-million parameter Qwen2.5 model surpassed GPT-4o with optimal TTS strategies
  • These improvements were achieved with 100-1000X less computational resources (FLOPS)

Future implications: While current research focuses on mathematical reasoning, these findings could reshape how AI systems are deployed in resource-constrained environments.

  • The success in mathematical reasoning suggests potential applications in other domains like coding and chemistry
  • The efficiency gains could make advanced AI capabilities more accessible to organizations with limited computational resources
  • As model sizes continue to grow, these findings offer an alternative path to achieving high performance without requiring massive models

Looking ahead: The diminishing returns of TTS on larger models suggest there may be an optimal balance between model size and computational enhancement techniques, pointing to a future where AI systems are optimized for efficiency rather than raw size.

How test-time scaling unlocks hidden reasoning abilities in small language models (and allows them to outperform LLMs)

Recent News

AI-powered agents poised to upend US auto industry in customers’ favor

Car buyers show strong interest in AI assistance for maintenance alerts and repair verification as dealerships aim to restore consumer confidence.

Eaton’s AI data center stock dips on the arrival of DeepSeek

Market jitters over AI efficiency gains overlook tech giants' continued commitment to data center expansion.

Long story short: Top AI summarizers for articles and documents in 2025

Enterprise-grade AI document summarizers are gaining traction as companies seek to cut down the 20% of work time spent organizing information.