Gen Z’s AI skepticism: A new study reveals that Generation Z, despite being digital natives, is more skeptical of artificial intelligence compared to older generations, particularly when it comes to AI integration on smartphones.
- The GWS research report found that 16% of 18- to 24-year-olds don’t want AI on their phones, compared to only 9% of older respondents.
- While 46% of older millennials favor AI for productivity boost, only 25% of Gen Z shares this sentiment.
- Gen Z’s skepticism persists despite feeling more knowledgeable about AI, with only 6% saying they don’t understand it enough to form an opinion.
Factors driving Gen Z’s AI wariness: Experts suggest that Gen Z’s unique experiences growing up in a digital-first world have shaped their perspectives on AI and technology.
- HR consultant Bryan Driscoll attributes Gen Z’s skepticism to their awareness of how technology has been used to exploit them, citing social media’s negative impact on mental health and profit-driven algorithms.
- Dev Nag, CEO of QueryPal, points to Gen Z’s heightened awareness of potential downsides like privacy concerns and job displacement fears.
- The desire for more authentic, human connections in an increasingly digital world may also contribute to their cautious stance on AI.
Workplace implications: Gen Z’s position in the workforce and limited exposure to AI benefits in their professional lives may be influencing their skepticism.
- Many Gen Z workers are in entry-level or service industry jobs that haven’t yet seen significant AI integration or benefits.
- Older millennials, by contrast, may be using AI tools for tasks like data analysis, content creation, or project management.
- Concerns about AI’s impact on job security in lower-skill positions could be fueling Gen Z’s skepticism.
Gender differences in AI acceptance: The study also revealed a gender gap in attitudes towards AI adoption.
- Men were more likely to embrace AI, with 46% supporting the technology if it made things easier.
- In comparison, only 31% of women expressed the same level of support for AI.
Privacy concerns and AI integration: Despite Gen Z’s skepticism, the study found that privacy concerns related to AI on smartphones were not widespread across generations.
- Only one in ten Americans expressed worry that AI would be “too intrusive” on their phones.
- This suggests that privacy may not be the primary driver of Gen Z’s reluctance to embrace AI on mobile devices.
Gen Z’s selective AI adoption: While skeptical of AI on smartphones, Gen Z has shown openness to AI in other areas of their lives.
- The younger generation has been embracing AI for financial advice and budgeting purposes.
- This selective adoption highlights the distinction between using AI at one’s own pace in personal life versus its implementation in smartphones and the workforce.
Implications for AI integration: Gen Z’s skepticism towards AI presents challenges for companies pushing for widespread AI adoption.
- Driscoll suggests that Gen Z’s stance is not anti-technology but rather pro-human and pro-worker.
- As Gen Z becomes the dominant workforce demographic, companies may face resistance if they fail to consider the human impact of AI integration.
Looking ahead: AI adoption and generational dynamics: The study’s findings underscore the need for a nuanced approach to AI integration that addresses generational concerns and values.
- AI developers and companies may need to focus on demonstrating tangible benefits and addressing ethical concerns to win over skeptical Gen Z users.
- The generational divide in AI acceptance could shape future workplace dynamics and technological adoption rates.
- As AI continues to evolve, bridging the gap between Gen Z’s skepticism and the potential benefits of AI will be crucial for widespread acceptance and effective implementation across all age groups.
Recent Stories
DOE fusion roadmap targets 2030s commercial deployment as AI drives $9B investment
The Department of Energy has released a new roadmap targeting commercial-scale fusion power deployment by the mid-2030s, though the plan lacks specific funding commitments and relies on scientific breakthroughs that have eluded researchers for decades. The strategy emphasizes public-private partnerships and positions AI as both a research tool and motivation for developing fusion energy to meet data centers' growing electricity demands. The big picture: The DOE's roadmap aims to "deliver the public infrastructure that supports the fusion private sector scale up in the 2030s," but acknowledges it cannot commit to specific funding levels and remains subject to Congressional appropriations. Why...
Oct 17, 2025Tying it all together: Credo’s purple cables power the $4B AI data center boom
Credo, a Silicon Valley semiconductor company specializing in data center cables and chips, has seen its stock price more than double this year to $143.61, following a 245% surge in 2024. The company's signature purple cables, which cost between $300-$500 each, have become essential infrastructure for AI data centers, positioning Credo to capitalize on the trillion-dollar AI infrastructure expansion as hyperscalers like Amazon, Microsoft, and Elon Musk's xAI rapidly build out massive computing facilities. What you should know: Credo's active electrical cables (AECs) are becoming indispensable for connecting the massive GPU clusters required for AI training and inference. The company...
Oct 17, 2025Vatican launches Latin American AI network for human development
The Vatican hosted a two-day conference bringing together 50 global experts to explore how artificial intelligence can advance peace, social justice, and human development. The event launched the Latin American AI Network for Integral Human Development and established principles for ethical AI governance that prioritize human dignity over technological advancement. What you should know: The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, the Vatican's research body for social issues, organized the "Digital Rerum Novarum" conference on October 16-17, combining academic research with practical AI applications. Participants included leading experts from MIT, Microsoft, Columbia University, the UN, and major European institutions. The conference...