A New Jersey federal judge has withdrawn his decision in a pharmaceutical securities case after lawyers identified fabricated quotes and false case citations in his ruling — errors that mirror the hallucination patterns commonly seen in AI-generated legal content. The withdrawal highlights growing concerns about artificial intelligence’s reliability in legal research, as attorneys increasingly turn to tools like ChatGPT despite their tendency to generate convincing but inaccurate information.
What happened: Judge Julien Xavier Neals pulled his decision denying CorMedix’s lawsuit dismissal request after attorney Andrew Lichtman identified a “series of errors” in the ruling.
- The opinion contained misstated outcomes from three other legal cases and “numerous instances” of fabricated quotes falsely attributed to judicial decisions.
- A court notice published Wednesday stated “that opinion and order were entered in error” and promised a corrected version would follow.
- While minor post-ruling corrections are common, major modifications like withdrawing entire decisions are rare in federal courts.
The AI connection: Though no official confirmation exists that AI was used, the citation errors display classic signs of AI hallucinations that have plagued other legal cases.
- Attorneys defending MyPillow founder Mike Lindell were fined earlier this month for submitting AI-generated citations in court filings.
- Anthropic’s own legal team blamed their Claude AI chatbot for making an “embarrassing” erroneous citation in the company’s battle with music publishers.
- These incidents represent just a fraction of cases where large language models have generated convincing but entirely fictional legal references.
Why this matters: The pattern of AI-generated legal errors demonstrates that current language models remain unreliable for professional legal research, despite their sophisticated output.
- The fabricated quotes and case outcomes in Judge Neals’ decision mirror the exact types of hallucinations that AI tools are known to produce when asked to cite legal precedents.
- As lawyers increasingly integrate AI tools into their research workflows, the legal system faces mounting challenges in distinguishing between legitimate citations and AI-generated fiction.
- The incident underscores that while AI can assist with legal work, it won’t be replacing human lawyers anytime soon — particularly given the profession’s reliance on accurate case law and precedent.
Recent Stories
DOE fusion roadmap targets 2030s commercial deployment as AI drives $9B investment
The Department of Energy has released a new roadmap targeting commercial-scale fusion power deployment by the mid-2030s, though the plan lacks specific funding commitments and relies on scientific breakthroughs that have eluded researchers for decades. The strategy emphasizes public-private partnerships and positions AI as both a research tool and motivation for developing fusion energy to meet data centers' growing electricity demands. The big picture: The DOE's roadmap aims to "deliver the public infrastructure that supports the fusion private sector scale up in the 2030s," but acknowledges it cannot commit to specific funding levels and remains subject to Congressional appropriations. Why...
Oct 17, 2025Tying it all together: Credo’s purple cables power the $4B AI data center boom
Credo, a Silicon Valley semiconductor company specializing in data center cables and chips, has seen its stock price more than double this year to $143.61, following a 245% surge in 2024. The company's signature purple cables, which cost between $300-$500 each, have become essential infrastructure for AI data centers, positioning Credo to capitalize on the trillion-dollar AI infrastructure expansion as hyperscalers like Amazon, Microsoft, and Elon Musk's xAI rapidly build out massive computing facilities. What you should know: Credo's active electrical cables (AECs) are becoming indispensable for connecting the massive GPU clusters required for AI training and inference. The company...
Oct 17, 2025Vatican launches Latin American AI network for human development
The Vatican hosted a two-day conference bringing together 50 global experts to explore how artificial intelligence can advance peace, social justice, and human development. The event launched the Latin American AI Network for Integral Human Development and established principles for ethical AI governance that prioritize human dignity over technological advancement. What you should know: The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, the Vatican's research body for social issues, organized the "Digital Rerum Novarum" conference on October 16-17, combining academic research with practical AI applications. Participants included leading experts from MIT, Microsoft, Columbia University, the UN, and major European institutions. The conference...