OpenAI’s ChatGPT has sparked widespread adoption of prompt engineering as a method to interact with AI systems, but Google DeepMind’s principal scientist argues this approach may be fundamentally flawed.
The current state of prompt engineering: The practice of crafting specific instructions for large language models has emerged as a dominant interface method for AI systems, with companies like Uber developing dedicated prompt engineering disciplines.
- Prompt engineering gained prominence following ChatGPT’s success in 2022-2023
- The field focuses on refining instructions to achieve optimal AI outputs
- Major organizations have invested heavily in developing prompt engineering expertise
Key criticisms from DeepMind: Meredith Ringel Morris, principal scientist for Human-AI Interaction at Google DeepMind, argues that prompting is an ineffective interface that should be phased out.
- Prompts rely on “pseudo” natural language rather than genuine human communication
- Minor variations in wording, spacing, or punctuation can dramatically affect results
- The approach lacks important elements of human conversation, such as contextual cues and theory-of-mind abilities
Impact on research integrity: The prevalence of prompt engineering is potentially compromising AI research quality and reproducibility.
- Research papers often fail to document the number of prompts used to achieve results
- Benchmark testing becomes unreliable due to variations in prompt formatting
- The practice of “prompt-hacking” makes it difficult to compare results across different studies
Proposed alternatives: Morris suggests several alternative interfaces that could provide more natural and effective ways to interact with AI systems.
- Traditional user interfaces with familiar buttons for predictable results
- True natural language interfaces that better mirror human communication
- High-bandwidth approaches including gesture interfaces and direct-manipulation interfaces
- Affective interfaces that respond to emotional states
Looking beyond the trend: The reliance on prompt engineering may be impeding progress toward more intuitive and effective AI interactions.
- Current prompting methods require specialized knowledge and training
- The learning curve associated with prompt engineering creates barriers to entry
- More natural interaction methods could eliminate the need for specialized prompt engineers
Critical perspective: While prompt engineering has enabled rapid advancement in AI applications, its limitations and drawbacks suggest it may indeed be a temporary solution rather than a long-term approach to human-AI interaction. The challenge lies in developing more intuitive interfaces while maintaining the power and flexibility that prompt engineering currently provides.
Recent Stories
DOE fusion roadmap targets 2030s commercial deployment as AI drives $9B investment
The Department of Energy has released a new roadmap targeting commercial-scale fusion power deployment by the mid-2030s, though the plan lacks specific funding commitments and relies on scientific breakthroughs that have eluded researchers for decades. The strategy emphasizes public-private partnerships and positions AI as both a research tool and motivation for developing fusion energy to meet data centers' growing electricity demands. The big picture: The DOE's roadmap aims to "deliver the public infrastructure that supports the fusion private sector scale up in the 2030s," but acknowledges it cannot commit to specific funding levels and remains subject to Congressional appropriations. Why...
Oct 17, 2025Tying it all together: Credo’s purple cables power the $4B AI data center boom
Credo, a Silicon Valley semiconductor company specializing in data center cables and chips, has seen its stock price more than double this year to $143.61, following a 245% surge in 2024. The company's signature purple cables, which cost between $300-$500 each, have become essential infrastructure for AI data centers, positioning Credo to capitalize on the trillion-dollar AI infrastructure expansion as hyperscalers like Amazon, Microsoft, and Elon Musk's xAI rapidly build out massive computing facilities. What you should know: Credo's active electrical cables (AECs) are becoming indispensable for connecting the massive GPU clusters required for AI training and inference. The company...
Oct 17, 2025Vatican launches Latin American AI network for human development
The Vatican hosted a two-day conference bringing together 50 global experts to explore how artificial intelligence can advance peace, social justice, and human development. The event launched the Latin American AI Network for Integral Human Development and established principles for ethical AI governance that prioritize human dignity over technological advancement. What you should know: The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, the Vatican's research body for social issues, organized the "Digital Rerum Novarum" conference on October 16-17, combining academic research with practical AI applications. Participants included leading experts from MIT, Microsoft, Columbia University, the UN, and major European institutions. The conference...