×
California’s New Laws Could Kill Election Deepfakes in Your Social Feeds
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

California takes legislative action against AI-generated election misinformation: Governor Gavin Newsom has signed three bills into law aimed at combating the spread of deepfakes and AI-generated content during elections, positioning the state as a leader in AI regulation.

Key provisions of AB 2839: This bill expands existing protections against deceptive AI-generated election materials and introduces stricter timelines for enforcement.

  • Distribution of AI-generated election content is prohibited within 120 days before an election and 60 days after.
  • Officials and candidates are granted the right to sue in order to prevent the distribution of such materials.
  • The bill is set to take effect before the 2024 presidential election, providing immediate safeguards against potential AI-driven misinformation campaigns.

Transparency requirements under AB 2355: Starting January 2025, this legislation mandates disclosure of AI use in political advertising.

  • Candidates will be required to explicitly state when their campaign advertisements utilize AI-generated content.
  • This measure aims to increase transparency and help voters distinguish between authentic and artificially created campaign materials.

Social media platform responsibilities outlined in AB 2655: Also effective from January 2025, this bill places new obligations on large social media companies to address AI deepfakes.

  • Platforms must establish mechanisms to receive and process complaints about AI-generated content.
  • Upon receiving a complaint, companies have 72 hours to either label or remove AI deepfakes.
  • The law provides candidates and officials with legal recourse if their complaints are not adequately addressed.
  • An exception is made for content clearly intended as satire or parody, preserving space for protected speech.

California’s leadership in AI regulation: The state’s proactive approach to AI legislation sets a precedent for other states and potentially federal lawmakers.

  • While California is at the forefront, 24 other states have either passed or are considering similar laws to address AI-generated content in elections.
  • Governor Newsom has also signed bills protecting actors from unauthorized AI reproduction of their likeness, further expanding the state’s AI regulatory framework.

Pending legislation and broader implications: The governor’s decision on an additional AI-related bill could further shape California’s stance on artificial intelligence.

  • SB 1047, described as controversial, awaits Newsom’s signature or veto.
  • The outcome of this bill could have significant implications for AI regulation in California and potentially influence similar efforts nationwide.

Balancing innovation and protection: California’s legislative actions reflect the complex challenge of regulating rapidly evolving AI technologies.

  • These laws aim to protect the integrity of elections and individual rights while still allowing for technological innovation.
  • The effectiveness of these measures will likely be closely watched by policymakers and tech industry leaders as AI continues to advance and integrate into various aspects of society.
New California Laws Could Kill Election Deepfakes on Your Social Media Feeds

Recent News

Trump pledges to reverse Biden’s AI policies amid global safety talks

Trump's vow to dismantle AI safeguards collides with the tech industry's growing acceptance of federal oversight and international safety standards.

AI predicts behavior of 1000 people in simulation study

Stanford researchers demonstrate AI models can now accurately mimic human decision-making patterns across large populations, marking a significant shift from traditional survey methods.

Strava limits third-party access to user fitness data

Popular workout-tracking platform restricts third-party access to user data, forcing fitness apps to find alternative data sources or scale back social features.