The evolving landscape of artificial intelligence in publishing has prompted new discussions about authors’ rights and control over their intellectual property.
Key position statement: The Authors Guild has released a comprehensive statement reinforcing that authors, not publishers or tech companies, should maintain control over AI licensing of their work.
- The organization emphasizes that authors must have the choice whether to allow their works to be used by AI and determine the specific terms of use
- This position follows HarperCollins becoming the first major trade publisher to establish an AI deal with a tech company
- The Guild expressed approval of HarperCollins’ careful approach, particularly the opt-out provision for authors
Contract implications: Standard publishing agreements do not automatically cover AI training rights, marking a clear distinction between traditional publishing and AI utilization.
- AI training is neither considered a new book format nor a new market or distribution mechanism
- Publishers must negotiate AI rights separately from existing contracts
- Subsidiary rights in current contracts do not inherently include AI training permissions
Copyright considerations: The legal framework supports authors retaining control over AI rights unless explicitly granted otherwise.
- Rights not expressly granted in publishing agreements typically remain with the original copyright owner
- Publishers must obtain separate agreements for AI licensing, even if they have broad reproduction rights
- Authors maintain the right to decline AI deals and can pursue independent AI licensing arrangements
Revenue sharing guidelines: The Authors Guild has established clear positions on fair compensation structures for AI licensing.
- Authors should receive 75-85% of AI licensing revenue, depending on publisher involvement
- Publisher compensation should be proportional to their role in facilitating and implementing AI deals
- Academic presses offering only 25% to authors are viewed as unfairly shifting risk while retaining most benefits
- AI licensing revenue should flow directly to authors rather than being applied against advances
Legal action and enforcement: The Authors Guild is actively pursuing legal remedies for unauthorized AI use of copyrighted materials.
- The organization is currently involved in a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft
- The lawsuit addresses systematic copyright infringement of protected books
- Current licensing efforts by AI companies do not absolve past violations
Looking forward: The emergence of AI licensing deals in publishing represents a critical junction for author rights, with the potential to establish important precedents for future content utilization in artificial intelligence development. Publishers’ handling of these new arrangements will likely shape industry standards for years to come, making the Authors Guild’s position particularly significant for protecting creators’ interests.
Recent Stories
DOE fusion roadmap targets 2030s commercial deployment as AI drives $9B investment
The Department of Energy has released a new roadmap targeting commercial-scale fusion power deployment by the mid-2030s, though the plan lacks specific funding commitments and relies on scientific breakthroughs that have eluded researchers for decades. The strategy emphasizes public-private partnerships and positions AI as both a research tool and motivation for developing fusion energy to meet data centers' growing electricity demands. The big picture: The DOE's roadmap aims to "deliver the public infrastructure that supports the fusion private sector scale up in the 2030s," but acknowledges it cannot commit to specific funding levels and remains subject to Congressional appropriations. Why...
Oct 17, 2025Tying it all together: Credo’s purple cables power the $4B AI data center boom
Credo, a Silicon Valley semiconductor company specializing in data center cables and chips, has seen its stock price more than double this year to $143.61, following a 245% surge in 2024. The company's signature purple cables, which cost between $300-$500 each, have become essential infrastructure for AI data centers, positioning Credo to capitalize on the trillion-dollar AI infrastructure expansion as hyperscalers like Amazon, Microsoft, and Elon Musk's xAI rapidly build out massive computing facilities. What you should know: Credo's active electrical cables (AECs) are becoming indispensable for connecting the massive GPU clusters required for AI training and inference. The company...
Oct 17, 2025Vatican launches Latin American AI network for human development
The Vatican hosted a two-day conference bringing together 50 global experts to explore how artificial intelligence can advance peace, social justice, and human development. The event launched the Latin American AI Network for Integral Human Development and established principles for ethical AI governance that prioritize human dignity over technological advancement. What you should know: The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, the Vatican's research body for social issues, organized the "Digital Rerum Novarum" conference on October 16-17, combining academic research with practical AI applications. Participants included leading experts from MIT, Microsoft, Columbia University, the UN, and major European institutions. The conference...