Apple refutes claim it used unethical data to train Apple Intelligence, affirming its commitment to using only ethically sourced data for its AI projects.
Apple’s response to allegations: While Apple had used data from a controversial dataset called “the Pile” in the past, it was only for research purposes and not for training Apple Intelligence:
- Apple stated the Pile data was used solely to train OpenELM research models released in April, which do not power any consumer-facing AI or machine learning features.
- The company has no plans to build new versions of OpenELM and emphasized that the models were never intended for use in Apple Intelligence.
Apple’s stance on ethical AI: Apple has consistently maintained that it only uses ethically sourced data for its artificial intelligence projects:
- The company reports paying millions to publishers and licensing images from reputable photo library firms to train its AI models.
- Apple aims to revolutionize its products with AI capabilities like more natural conversations with Siri, but insists it will do so using data gathered responsibly.
The competitive AI landscape: As AI development accelerates industrywide, concerns are growing about the origins of training data used by tech companies:
- The revelation that a research lab harvested YouTube video subtitles without creators’ consent to assemble “the Pile” dataset, which was then used by Apple, Nvidia, Salesforce and others, underscores the need for greater transparency and oversight.
- While it’s positive that Apple is now focused on working with ethically sourced data, the incident highlights complex challenges around data collection practices as the AI race heats up.
Looking ahead: Apple’s planned AI-powered enhancements, such as more contextual awareness for Siri, will roll out gradually in the coming years:
- iOS 18 will deliver Apple Intelligence features starting this fall, but some capabilities won’t arrive until at least 2025.
- As pressure mounts on tech giants to develop AI responsibly, Apple’s commitment to ethical data sourcing may prove a key differentiator, even if it means certain innovations take longer to reach consumers.
The allegations against Apple underscore the critical importance of transparency and responsible data collection as AI technologies become increasingly central to our digital experiences. While Apple’s response provides some reassurance, it also serves as a reminder of the need for clear industry standards and accountability measures to ensure AI is developed in an ethical manner.
Apple refutes claim it trained Apple Intelligence on stolen data — here's what we know