×
All-In: Telecom giants build national AI data centers instead of distributing GPUs across networks
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

Mobile operators worldwide are investing in AI infrastructure to create nationally-focused GPU-as-a-Service offerings, marking a strategic shift in how telecom companies approach artificial intelligence services. Rather than distributing GPUs throughout their networks for low-latency applications, carriers like SKT, DOCOMO, Verizon, and Swisscom are building centralized AI data centers designed to provide sovereign AI services within national borders. This approach represents both a departure from unsuccessful “walled garden” strategies of the past and a recognition of the realistic timeline for AI applications that genuinely require network-edge processing.

The big picture: Major telecom operators across the globe are establishing centralized GPU data centers to offer AI services, but they’re not distributing this computing power throughout their radio access networks (RAN).

  • Companies including SKT, DOCOMO, Verizon, T-Mobile, Singtel, Swisscom, Telenor, and Softbank have all begun investing in GPU infrastructure.
  • These investments are focused on creating nationally-centralized AI data centers rather than distributing GPU computing across cellular networks.

Key insight: Very little of the potential GPU-as-a-Service market requires the ultra-low latency that would necessitate placing GPUs throughout the cellular network.

  • Market analysis reveals minimal revenue opportunities for AI services requiring network latency below 100 milliseconds.
  • Promising applications in augmented reality, automotive, and remote machinery that could drive sub-100ms AI revenue are likely to mature in the 2030-2035 timeframe.

Behind the strategy: Telecom operators are primarily pursuing “sovereign AI services” that keep data processing within national boundaries rather than ultra-low latency applications.

  • Carriers like Swisscom, Telenor, and Singtel are positioned to succeed by offering AI services that respect national data sovereignty requirements.
  • This approach allows operators to leverage their natural advantage in providing services precisely within a country’s borders.

Economic reality: The return on investment for distributing GPUs throughout the radio access network remains challenging.

  • Implementing distributed GPU computing would require significant investments in Grace Blackwell servers, fiber upgrades, and power/cooling infrastructure overhauls at central office sites.
  • While there are potential energy savings from centralized RAN pooling, these benefits plus new revenue from localized services may not justify the massive infrastructure investment.

Reading between the lines: This approach echoes previous unsuccessful “walled garden” and “edge computing” initiatives, but with a more focused and potentially viable business model.

  • Rather than attempting to create proprietary ecosystems or unnecessarily distributed computing, operators are focusing on the specific national-level services where they have natural advantages.
  • The approach acknowledges market realities while carving out a potentially sustainable niche for telecom operators in the AI services landscape.
GPU-as-a-Service offered by mobile operators (Analyst Angle)

Recent News

Musk-backed DOGE project targets federal workforce with AI automation

DOGE recruitment effort targets 300 standardized roles affecting 70,000 federal employees, sparking debate over AI readiness for government work.

AI tools are changing workflows more than they are cutting jobs

Counterintuitively, the Danish study found that ChatGPT and similar AI tools created new job tasks for workers and saved only about three hours of labor monthly.

Disney abandons Slack after hacker steals terabytes of confidential data using fake AI tool

A Disney employee fell victim to malware disguised as an AI art tool, enabling the hacker to steal 1.1 terabytes of confidential data and forcing the company to abandon Slack entirely.