×
AI’s limitations in warfare is debunked by military experts
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence in military applications has sparked debate about its potential to serve as a decisive advantage in future conflicts, particularly as the U.S. seeks to maintain military supremacy against numerically superior adversaries.

Current military perspective: The U.S. Air Force and Department of Defense increasingly view AI integration as a military necessity, not a luxury.

  • Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall emphasized this stance after experiencing an AI-controlled fighter jet, stating “It’s a security risk not to have it”
  • The Pentagon sees AI as potentially following in the tradition of previous “offset” technologies like nuclear weapons and stealth capabilities that helped counter adversaries’ numerical advantages
  • China’s military superiority in numbers, with 2.18 million active personnel and the world’s largest navy, has intensified the search for technological advantages

Reality check from Ukraine: The ongoing conflict in Ukraine provides important insights about AI’s limitations in modern warfare.

  • Despite unprecedented use of AI-enabled systems and electronic warfare by both sides, neither has achieved a decisive advantage
  • The conflict has instead devolved into conventional attrition warfare, suggesting AI hasn’t fundamentally changed warfare’s nature
  • Space Force assessments confirm this conflict features more electronic warfare than ever previously documented

Historical context: Past technological innovations offer cautionary tales about over-reliance on advanced technology.

  • Nazi Germany’s V-1 and V-2 missiles, despite being revolutionary, proved less effective than conventional bombing
  • Helicopter evacuation capabilities in Vietnam, while saving numerous lives, did not alter the war’s strategic outcome
  • These examples demonstrate that technological superiority alone doesn’t guarantee military success

Strategic implications: A more nuanced approach to military advancement is needed beyond AI development.

  • The U.S. must maintain its industrial base, global alliances, and economic dynamism
  • Future conflicts, particularly in regions like the Taiwan Strait, will likely be determined by industrial capacity and ability to sustain losses
  • Victory will depend more on comprehensive national power than technological sophistication alone

Looking beyond the hype: While AI represents a significant military advancement, it’s essential to maintain realistic expectations about its impact on warfare.

  • Unlike nuclear weapons, AI hasn’t fundamentally altered the nature of great power competition
  • Success in future conflicts will require integrating AI with other elements of national power
  • The ability to sustain prolonged conflict through industrial capacity and national will remains crucial

Critical analysis: The enthusiasm for AI as a military game-changer must be tempered with practical considerations and historical lessons, suggesting that while AI will play an important role in future conflicts, it’s unlikely to serve as a singular decisive factor in determining military outcomes.

No, AI will not win the next war

Recent News

Chile develops Latam-GPT, a 50B-parameter AI model for Latin America

The open-source model addresses cultural blind spots that global AI systems routinely miss.

Alibaba shares surge 19% as cloud growth and AI chip development fuel rally

Cloud revenue growth accelerated to 26% as AI products maintained triple-digit expansion for the eighth straight quarter.

Gatineau, Canada transit deploys $1M AI system to predict bus breakdowns by 2026

Sensors will alert maintenance teams before engines fail, targeting better punctuality.