AI video generation platforms have a significant hidden cost that many users may not anticipate: the payment structure often forces customers to pay for unusable content. Jack Wallen’s experience testing an unnamed AI video generation service reveals that approximately 90% of generated videos were unusable, despite consuming valuable credits. This pricing model creates a substantial efficiency problem that businesses should carefully consider before investing in AI-generated video content.
The core issue: AI video generation services typically charge users based on the number of videos generated rather than the number of satisfactory videos downloaded.
- When testing one such service, Wallen found that roughly 9 out of 10 AI-generated videos were completely unusable for professional purposes.
- Even though most outputs were worthless, each generation consumed paid credits regardless of quality or usability.
The financial reality: Using a simplified example of $100 for 100 credits with each video costing 10 credits, users effectively pay $100 for just one usable video when factoring in the 90% failure rate.
- The company justified this model by explaining that the computational costs of running these AI systems are extremely high and must be passed to consumers.
- When Wallen suggested charging only for downloaded videos, the company declined, citing operational expenses.
Why this matters: This hidden inefficiency significantly impacts the true cost-benefit analysis for businesses considering AI video generation.
- What initially seems like a cost-saving alternative to traditional video production may actually represent poor value when accounting for the high percentage of unusable outputs.
- Companies under economic pressure might mistakenly view AI video generation as a budget-friendly option without understanding the actual cost per usable video.
The bottom line: Consumers should thoroughly test these services through free trials before committing financial resources.
- For many businesses, hiring traditional video production companies might ultimately be more cost-effective despite higher upfront pricing.
- Users need to evaluate whether getting what you pay for only 10% of the time represents a worthwhile investment.
Recent Stories
DOE fusion roadmap targets 2030s commercial deployment as AI drives $9B investment
The Department of Energy has released a new roadmap targeting commercial-scale fusion power deployment by the mid-2030s, though the plan lacks specific funding commitments and relies on scientific breakthroughs that have eluded researchers for decades. The strategy emphasizes public-private partnerships and positions AI as both a research tool and motivation for developing fusion energy to meet data centers' growing electricity demands. The big picture: The DOE's roadmap aims to "deliver the public infrastructure that supports the fusion private sector scale up in the 2030s," but acknowledges it cannot commit to specific funding levels and remains subject to Congressional appropriations. Why...
Oct 17, 2025Tying it all together: Credo’s purple cables power the $4B AI data center boom
Credo, a Silicon Valley semiconductor company specializing in data center cables and chips, has seen its stock price more than double this year to $143.61, following a 245% surge in 2024. The company's signature purple cables, which cost between $300-$500 each, have become essential infrastructure for AI data centers, positioning Credo to capitalize on the trillion-dollar AI infrastructure expansion as hyperscalers like Amazon, Microsoft, and Elon Musk's xAI rapidly build out massive computing facilities. What you should know: Credo's active electrical cables (AECs) are becoming indispensable for connecting the massive GPU clusters required for AI training and inference. The company...
Oct 17, 2025Vatican launches Latin American AI network for human development
The Vatican hosted a two-day conference bringing together 50 global experts to explore how artificial intelligence can advance peace, social justice, and human development. The event launched the Latin American AI Network for Integral Human Development and established principles for ethical AI governance that prioritize human dignity over technological advancement. What you should know: The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, the Vatican's research body for social issues, organized the "Digital Rerum Novarum" conference on October 16-17, combining academic research with practical AI applications. Participants included leading experts from MIT, Microsoft, Columbia University, the UN, and major European institutions. The conference...