Study Overview: Scientists at King’s College London’s Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN) conducted a comprehensive evaluation of AI algorithms to determine which ones best predict biological age from blood samples.
- The research team analyzed 17 different AI algorithms using data from over 225,000 UK Biobank participants
- The study focused on 168 different metabolites from blood plasma
- The average age of participants was 56.97 years old
Technical Methodology: The research utilized nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to analyze blood plasma samples and evaluate metabolomic markers.
- NMR spectroscopy is a non-invasive technique that analyzes organic molecules using magnetic fields and radio waves
- The team developed a metric called “MileAge” to measure biological age based on metabolite biomarkers
- MileAge delta represents the difference between a person’s biological and chronological age
Key Findings: The study identified several high-performing AI algorithms for predicting biological age and life span.
- Tree-based ensembles and support vector regression showed consistently strong performance
- Cubist rule-based regression emerged as the top-performing algorithm
- Higher MileAge delta scores correlated strongly with increased frailty, shorter telomeres, chronic illness, and mortality risk
Health Implications: The research revealed important correlations between metabolomic aging and health outcomes.
- Accelerated aging (higher MileAge delta) showed clear links to poor health outcomes and increased mortality
- Surprisingly, decelerated aging did not reliably indicate better health outcomes
- The findings suggest metabolomics-based risk assessment is most useful for identifying high-risk patients
Research Applications: The study established a foundation for future developments in aging research and healthcare.
- The MileAge system shows promise for health assessments and risk stratification
- Researchers recommend developing tissue and cell-specific aging clocks as next steps
- The findings could contribute to research on life span and health span extension
Future Directions: While this research presents a significant advance in biological age prediction, several important considerations remain for practical implementation.
- The technology’s effectiveness needs validation across diverse populations and age groups
- Integration into clinical practice will require standardization and regulatory approval
- The focus should remain on identifying high-risk patients rather than making broad health predictions
Using AI to Predict Health and Longevity