Public opinion and AI expert perspectives on artificial intelligence reveal significant divergences in outlook, particularly around employment impacts and risk assessment. The new Pew Research Center report highlights how demographic factors influence AI perceptions within the expert community, with notable gender-based differences in enthusiasm and concern. This opinion gap underscores the importance of diverse representation in AI development, especially as both groups express shared worries about misinformation and limited personal control over the technology’s growing presence in daily life.
The big picture: Both AI experts and the general public feel they lack control over artificial intelligence’s role in their lives, with more than half of respondents in both groups desiring greater personal agency over the technology.
Diverging on job futures: The public and experts hold significantly different views on AI’s impact on employment markets.
- Two-thirds of the general public believe AI will eliminate jobs in the coming decades, compared to only 40% of AI experts who share this concern.
- Technical experts demonstrate greater optimism about AI’s potential to enhance human productivity rather than replace workers outright.
Gender shapes expert perspectives: Male and female AI specialists exhibit notably different attitudes toward the technology they help develop.
- Male experts generally express more enthusiasm about AI’s potential benefits.
- Female experts show greater caution regarding AI’s societal implications and risks.
- Both expert groups acknowledge white males are overrepresented in AI design and development.
Shared electoral skepticism: Both the public and experts express significant doubt about AI’s impact on democratic processes.
- Only 10% of respondents believe artificial intelligence will positively influence elections.
- Both groups voice concerns about deepfakes and AI-generated misinformation undermining public discourse.
- More than half of all respondents worry about inherent bias in AI systems.
Consensus on solutions: Despite differences in other areas, both groups broadly agree on necessary steps to address AI challenges.
- Support for increased government regulation crosses both expert and public opinion.
- Both groups demand greater corporate accountability in AI development and deployment.
- There’s shared recognition of the need for diverse perspectives in designing AI systems to mitigate potential harms.
Recent Stories
DOE fusion roadmap targets 2030s commercial deployment as AI drives $9B investment
The Department of Energy has released a new roadmap targeting commercial-scale fusion power deployment by the mid-2030s, though the plan lacks specific funding commitments and relies on scientific breakthroughs that have eluded researchers for decades. The strategy emphasizes public-private partnerships and positions AI as both a research tool and motivation for developing fusion energy to meet data centers' growing electricity demands. The big picture: The DOE's roadmap aims to "deliver the public infrastructure that supports the fusion private sector scale up in the 2030s," but acknowledges it cannot commit to specific funding levels and remains subject to Congressional appropriations. Why...
Oct 17, 2025Tying it all together: Credo’s purple cables power the $4B AI data center boom
Credo, a Silicon Valley semiconductor company specializing in data center cables and chips, has seen its stock price more than double this year to $143.61, following a 245% surge in 2024. The company's signature purple cables, which cost between $300-$500 each, have become essential infrastructure for AI data centers, positioning Credo to capitalize on the trillion-dollar AI infrastructure expansion as hyperscalers like Amazon, Microsoft, and Elon Musk's xAI rapidly build out massive computing facilities. What you should know: Credo's active electrical cables (AECs) are becoming indispensable for connecting the massive GPU clusters required for AI training and inference. The company...
Oct 17, 2025Vatican launches Latin American AI network for human development
The Vatican hosted a two-day conference bringing together 50 global experts to explore how artificial intelligence can advance peace, social justice, and human development. The event launched the Latin American AI Network for Integral Human Development and established principles for ethical AI governance that prioritize human dignity over technological advancement. What you should know: The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, the Vatican's research body for social issues, organized the "Digital Rerum Novarum" conference on October 16-17, combining academic research with practical AI applications. Participants included leading experts from MIT, Microsoft, Columbia University, the UN, and major European institutions. The conference...