×
Written by
Published on
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

The rapid advancements in generative AI are sparking both excitement and concern in the music industry, as AI-powered tools promise to democratize music creation while potentially displacing human musicians and creators.

AI’s limitations in creating truly meaningful music: While AI can replicate musical patterns and generate convincing clips, it lacks the human elements that make music resonate with listeners on a deep level:

  • Successful music depends on an artist’s unique voice, life experiences, and the ability to break rules and subvert expectations, qualities that algorithms struggle to replicate.
  • The shared cultural experience of people connecting with the same songs is lost when AI personalizes music for each individual.
  • AI arranges noise, but creating music requires the complex web of relationships, discourse, and context in which art is made.

AI as a tool, not a replacement for human creativity: Musicians have a long history of experimenting with technology, and AI can be seen as another tool in their creative arsenal:

  • AI can assist artists with specific tasks like mixing, mastering, or lyric revision, providing a starting point for their own ideas.
  • Some artists, like Holly Herndon and Mat Dryhurst, are already pushing the boundaries of AI-generated sounds and images in their work.
  • However, the use of AI in music creation raises questions about the speed and scale at which it can replace human labor.

The real threat: AI’s impact on artists’ livelihoods: The concern surrounding AI in music is less about creativity and more about the potential displacement of human labor and the concentration of power in the hands of a few tech companies:

  • While AI may not replace superstar artists, it could take over jobs in commercial music production, such as jingles and background music.
  • Record labels are suing AI music startups over concerns about the speed and scale at which AI can create music without permission or compensation to the musicians whose work the tools are trained on.
  • The resources required to develop cutting-edge AI models are concentrated among a handful of powerful companies, raising questions about accountability and the potential for further entrenchment of oligopolies.

Navigating the future of music in the age of AI: As the music industry grapples with the implications of generative AI, the key challenge will be finding a balance between embracing the technology’s potential and protecting the livelihoods of human creators:

  • The industry may need to consider implementing “speed limits” on AI-generated music to ensure fair competition and compensation for human musicians.
  • Amid the flood of AI-generated content, listeners may increasingly seek out and value the human touch in music, as evidenced by the author’s powerful emotional connection to Birdy’s live performances.
  • Ultimately, the success of AI in music will depend not on its ability to replace human creativity, but on how it is integrated into the complex ecosystem of art, labor, and cultural value.
AI Needs a Speed Limit

Recent News

AI Governance Takes Center Stage in ASEAN-Stanford HAI Workshop

Southeast Asian officials discuss AI governance challenges and regional cooperation with Stanford experts.

Slack is Launching AI Note-Taking for Huddles

The feature aims to streamline meetings and boost productivity by automatically generating notes during Slack huddles.

Google’s AI Tool ‘Food Mood’ Will Help You Create Mouth-Watering Meals

Google's new AI tool blends cuisines from different countries to create unique recipes for adventurous home cooks.