×
AI’s energy demands set to triple, but economic gains expected to surpass costs
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

The International Monetary Fund projects that artificial intelligence will boost global economic output by 0.5% annually between 2025-2030, creating benefits that outweigh the environmental costs of increased energy consumption from data centers. This finding highlights the complex trade-offs between technological advancement and sustainability, as AI adoption accelerates amid growing concerns about climate impacts and energy demands in the digital infrastructure sector.

The big picture: AI-driven economic gains will exceed the environmental costs of increased carbon emissions from data centers, according to a new IMF report titled “Power Hungry: How AI Will Drive Energy Demand.”

  • The IMF estimates AI will boost global GDP by approximately 0.5% annually between 2025 and 2030, generating more economic value than the social costs of additional carbon emissions.
  • However, these economic benefits won’t be distributed equally worldwide, prompting the IMF to call on policymakers and businesses to minimize broader societal costs.

Behind the numbers: AI’s electricity demands could more than triple to around 1,500 terawatt-hours by 2030, equivalent to India’s current electricity consumption.

  • This projected energy consumption would be 1.5 times higher than the expected demand from electric vehicles over the same period.
  • Data center expansion is already substantial, with server-filled warehouses in northern Virginia alone occupying floor space equivalent to eight Empire State Buildings.

Environmental impact: Strong AI adoption would increase global greenhouse gas emissions by 1.2% between 2025-2030 under current energy policies.

  • The IMF quantifies this environmental cost at between $50.7 billion and $66.3 billion, using a social cost of carbon at $39 per ton.
  • Greener energy policies could potentially limit the increase in emissions, though specific strategies weren’t detailed in the report.

Why this matters: The relationship between AI advancement and sustainability represents a crucial balancing act for governments and technology companies globally.

  • How AI is deployed will significantly influence both its economic benefits and environmental impacts, particularly whether it leads to efficiency gains in energy use or more sustainable consumption patterns.

Counterpoints: AI could potentially reduce overall carbon emissions if properly directed toward climate solutions.

  • The Grantham Research Institute suggests AI could accelerate advances in low-carbon technologies across power, food, and transport sectors.
  • However, Grantham policy fellow Roberta Pierfederici cautions that “market forces alone are unlikely to successfully drive AI’s application toward climate action.”

Where we go from here: Intentional policies and collaboration between governments, tech companies, and energy providers will be essential to maximize AI’s benefits while minimizing environmental harm.

  • R&D funding and policies addressing inequalities exacerbated by AI advances will be needed to ensure the technology is deployed “intentionally, equitably and sustainably.”
AI economic gains likely to outweigh emissions cost, says IMF

Recent News

Foxconn Q1 profit to surge on AI server demand boom

Apple's largest iPhone assembler expects 72% profit jump to $1.25 billion in Q1, buoyed by strong demand for Nvidia AI servers despite US-China trade tensions.

Music stars push AI copyright transparency in UK law, tout their pro-innovation stance

UK entertainment industry leaders seek legal requirements forcing AI companies to disclose when they use copyrighted materials, amid growing tension over creative rights and economic impacts.

AI-designed irritable bowel disease drug enters human trials for the first time

First AI-designed antibody for irritable bowel disease reaches clinical testing, potentially shortening drug development timelines from five years to 24 months.