×
AI drama unfolds over Minnesota’s new anti-deepfake law
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

The legal battle over Minnesota’s anti-deepfake legislation has taken an unexpected turn due to artificial intelligence-generated content being used in court documents.

Key development: Minnesota’s defense of its anti-deepfake law faces scrutiny after the discovery that expert testimony supporting the law was partially generated using ChatGPT, an AI language model.

  • Stanford misinformation expert Jeff Hancock acknowledged using ChatGPT to help write his declaration supporting the law
  • The AI tool generated incorrect citations within the legal document
  • Opponents of the law have filed a motion requesting the withdrawal of the ChatGPT-assisted declaration

Legal implications: The controversy highlights the complex intersection of AI tools and legal proceedings, particularly in cases involving AI regulation.

  • Attorney Frank Bednarz, representing the plaintiffs, criticized Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison’s office for not retracting the report containing AI-generated fabrications
  • The situation raises questions about attorneys’ professional ethical obligations to the court when dealing with AI-generated content
  • This case demonstrates the potential risks of using AI tools in legal documentation without proper verification

The irony factor: A law designed to combat AI-generated deception has become entangled in its own AI-related controversy.

  • The situation underscores the challenges of regulating artificial intelligence while the legal system grapples with its proper use in official proceedings
  • The case illustrates how AI tools can inadvertently compromise legal arguments, even when used by experts in the field
  • The incident may influence future guidelines regarding the use of AI in legal documentation

Looking ahead: This development could have lasting implications for both AI regulation and the use of AI tools in legal proceedings, potentially leading to stricter guidelines about disclosure and verification of AI-assisted content in court documents.

Minnesota’s anti-deepfake law is embroiled in AI drama.

Recent News

AI agents reshape digital workplaces as Moveworks invests heavily

AI agents evolve from chatbots to task-completing digital coworkers as Moveworks launches comprehensive platform for enterprise-ready agent creation, integration, and deployment.

McGovern Institute at MIT celebrates a quarter century of brain science research

MIT's McGovern Institute marks 25 years of translating brain research into practical applications, from CRISPR gene therapy to neural-controlled prosthetics.

Agentic AI transforms hiring practices in recruitment industry

AI recruitment tools accelerate candidate matching and reduce bias, but require human oversight to ensure effective hiring decisions.