×
AI disrupts news industry as publishers fight for control
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

The News Media Alliance, a major publishing industry lobbying group, is preparing legal action against a prominent AI company over alleged copyright infringement of publisher content used to train AI models.

The core issue: The News Media Alliance (NMA), representing major publishers like Gannett, Condé Nast, and others, plans to file a complaint alleging unauthorized use of publisher content in AI model training.

  • The upcoming legal action will demonstrate instances where AI models allegedly copied text without proper attribution or licensing
  • The specific AI company targeted remains undisclosed, though existing licensing deals between NMA members and OpenAI suggest it may be a different entity
  • Not all NMA members are participating in the planned lawsuit

Industry context: Publishers are increasingly taking legal action against AI companies while simultaneously pursuing licensing agreements with them.

Internal dynamics: The AI controversy has energized the NMA while exposing tensions between member organizations.

  • The organization has become more vocal in challenging tech companies that potentially divert traffic and revenue from publishers
  • During a strategy call, Gannett’s CEO criticized Axios’s partnership with OpenAI in local markets
  • Disagreements emerged over which news outlet should receive the exclusive announcement of the planned legal action

Strategic considerations: The legal landscape around AI and copyright remains unclear, driving publishers to seek judicial clarity.

  • Publishers argue that Large Language Models (AI systems that process and generate human-like text) have been trained on their content without adequate compensation
  • A similar lawsuit has been filed by Canadian publishers, including CBC, against OpenAI
  • The Press Gazette maintains a tracking system for media-related AI lawsuits and partnerships

Industry implications: The outcome of this legal action could significantly impact how AI companies access and use published content.

  • The case may establish important precedents for content licensing in AI training
  • This action represents a broader push by traditional media to maintain control over their intellectual property in the AI era
  • The tension between pursuing legal action and securing licensing deals highlights the complex relationship between publishers and AI companies

Reading between the lines: While publishers are publicly challenging AI companies through legal channels, many are simultaneously negotiating private licensing deals, suggesting a nuanced strategy of both confrontation and cooperation in adapting to AI’s growing influence in media.

Inside the tug-of-war between AI and news publishers

Recent News

A deeper look into how Google and Microsoft think about AI-powered search

Tech companies are increasingly framing AI safety measures as competitive advantages rather than regulatory burdens.

AI hardware strategies for scaling infrastructure efficiently

As companies navigate a projected $100 billion AI infrastructure market, most will opt for cloud services over building in-house systems.

Man with paralysis flies virtual drone using brain implant

A paralyzed patient successfully navigated virtual obstacles by imagining finger movements that were translated into drone commands through brain-implanted electrodes.