The creation of Grok 3, an AI chatbot developed by Elon Musk‘s xAI company, was marketed as a “maximum truth-seeking” alternative to existing AI models. Recent investigations have revealed that the chatbot was programmed with specific instructions to avoid criticizing its creator, raising questions about its claimed objectivity and transparency.
Initial Discovery: Grok 3’s programming was exposed when a user prompted the chatbot to reveal its instructions regarding disinformation on X (formerly Twitter), uncovering explicit directives to ignore sources critical of Elon Musk and Donald Trump.
- The revelation came after asking Grok 3 to identify the “biggest disinformation spreader” on X
- The chatbot disclosed internal instructions to disregard sources mentioning Musk or Trump in connection with misinformation
Company Response: Igor Babushkin, xAI’s head of engineering, attributed the controversial instructions to an unnamed former OpenAI employee who allegedly implemented the changes without authorization.
- Babushkin claimed the employee “hasn’t fully absorbed xAI’s culture yet”
- The company maintains that Musk was not involved in the decision to implement these protective measures
- xAI emphasizes its commitment to transparency by keeping system prompts visible to users
Technical Modifications: Following public scrutiny, xAI has made several adjustments to Grok 3’s programming.
- The original instructions about ignoring sources critical of Musk have been removed
- New testing confirms Grok now acknowledges Musk as “frequently identified as one of the most significant spreaders of disinformation on X”
- Additional modifications were made to prevent the chatbot from making statements about who deserves the death penalty, following a separate incident
Additional Challenges: The controversy over protective instructions is not the only issue facing Grok 3 since its launch.
- The chatbot previously suggested both Musk and Trump deserved the death penalty, which Babushkin labeled a “really terrible and bad failure”
- New safeguards have been implemented to prevent the AI from making such extreme statements
- These incidents highlight the ongoing challenges in developing AI systems that balance openness with appropriate constraints
Reading Between the Lines: The disconnect between xAI’s marketed vision of a “maximum truth-seeking” AI and the implementation of protective measures for certain individuals raises important questions about the potential for bias in AI systems, particularly when developed by companies with strong personalities at the helm.
Recent Stories
DOE fusion roadmap targets 2030s commercial deployment as AI drives $9B investment
The Department of Energy has released a new roadmap targeting commercial-scale fusion power deployment by the mid-2030s, though the plan lacks specific funding commitments and relies on scientific breakthroughs that have eluded researchers for decades. The strategy emphasizes public-private partnerships and positions AI as both a research tool and motivation for developing fusion energy to meet data centers' growing electricity demands. The big picture: The DOE's roadmap aims to "deliver the public infrastructure that supports the fusion private sector scale up in the 2030s," but acknowledges it cannot commit to specific funding levels and remains subject to Congressional appropriations. Why...
Oct 17, 2025Tying it all together: Credo’s purple cables power the $4B AI data center boom
Credo, a Silicon Valley semiconductor company specializing in data center cables and chips, has seen its stock price more than double this year to $143.61, following a 245% surge in 2024. The company's signature purple cables, which cost between $300-$500 each, have become essential infrastructure for AI data centers, positioning Credo to capitalize on the trillion-dollar AI infrastructure expansion as hyperscalers like Amazon, Microsoft, and Elon Musk's xAI rapidly build out massive computing facilities. What you should know: Credo's active electrical cables (AECs) are becoming indispensable for connecting the massive GPU clusters required for AI training and inference. The company...
Oct 17, 2025Vatican launches Latin American AI network for human development
The Vatican hosted a two-day conference bringing together 50 global experts to explore how artificial intelligence can advance peace, social justice, and human development. The event launched the Latin American AI Network for Integral Human Development and established principles for ethical AI governance that prioritize human dignity over technological advancement. What you should know: The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, the Vatican's research body for social issues, organized the "Digital Rerum Novarum" conference on October 16-17, combining academic research with practical AI applications. Participants included leading experts from MIT, Microsoft, Columbia University, the UN, and major European institutions. The conference...