×
AI alignment funding or regulation?
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

The ongoing debate between increasing AI alignment funding versus strengthening AI regulation represents a critical junction in humanity’s approach to managing artificial superintelligence (ASI) risks and development.

Core challenges: The path to surviving ASI development presents two main options: either successfully aligning/controlling ASI or preventing its creation indefinitely.

  • Alignment success depends on having both sufficient trained experts and adequate time to solve complex technical challenges
  • A rough mathematical model suggests that doubling available time creates twice as much progress, while doubling the number of experts only increases progress by about 1.4 times
  • Prevention requires unprecedented global cooperation and sustained technological restraint across all nations

Current landscape: The financial disparity between AI safety and AI development spending reveals significant challenges in both approaches.

  • AI safety spending remains relatively modest at $0.1-0.2 billion annually
  • Major tech companies are investing approximately $235 billion yearly in AI infrastructure
  • Total U.S. AI spending is estimated at around $300 billion annually, with rapid growth projected

Regulatory challenges: Implementing effective AI regulation faces substantial economic and political hurdles.

  • Delaying AI progress by 10 years could cost tech companies an estimated $5 trillion in expected value
  • Major stakeholders actively resist regulation and have considerable political influence
  • International cooperation between competing powers like the U.S. and China presents additional complications

Funding perspective: Increasing alignment funding offers a potentially more achievable path forward.

  • Raising annual AI alignment spending from $0.2 billion to $1.6 billion represents a relatively modest increase compared to other government expenditures
  • Early investment helps build expertise and raises the “Overton window” for future alignment spending
  • Current funding levels are minimal compared to the U.S. military budget of $800 billion annually

Strategic implications: While both increased regulation and funding deserve attention, the relative ease of implementing funding changes suggests a practical starting point.

  • Creating permanent ASI prevention mechanisms would require unprecedented global cooperation
  • No world leader has yet demonstrated willingness to make serious sacrifices over AI risk
  • The AI alignment community can pursue both funding increases and regulatory measures simultaneously

Looking ahead: The path forward likely requires a multi-pronged approach that leverages both funding and regulation, rather than treating them as mutually exclusive options. Success may depend on finding ways to balance immediate practical steps with longer-term strategic goals.

Should you increase AI alignment funding, or increase AI regulation?

Recent News

xAI launches and then pulls its new AI image generator Aurora

X's brief test of the Aurora image generator demonstrated advanced capabilities in creating photorealistic images but raised familiar concerns about protecting real people's likenesses.

Everything to know about the iOS 18.2 update

Apple's major iOS update will limit advanced AI features to newer iPhone models, signaling a gradual approach to artificial intelligence integration.

Humanitarian groups embrace AI to boost global impact

Aid organizations are testing AI tools to provide verified information, education, and climate forecasts to hundreds of millions affected by unprecedented humanitarian crises.