×
AI alignment funding or regulation?
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

The ongoing debate between increasing AI alignment funding versus strengthening AI regulation represents a critical junction in humanity’s approach to managing artificial superintelligence (ASI) risks and development.

Core challenges: The path to surviving ASI development presents two main options: either successfully aligning/controlling ASI or preventing its creation indefinitely.

  • Alignment success depends on having both sufficient trained experts and adequate time to solve complex technical challenges
  • A rough mathematical model suggests that doubling available time creates twice as much progress, while doubling the number of experts only increases progress by about 1.4 times
  • Prevention requires unprecedented global cooperation and sustained technological restraint across all nations

Current landscape: The financial disparity between AI safety and AI development spending reveals significant challenges in both approaches.

  • AI safety spending remains relatively modest at $0.1-0.2 billion annually
  • Major tech companies are investing approximately $235 billion yearly in AI infrastructure
  • Total U.S. AI spending is estimated at around $300 billion annually, with rapid growth projected

Regulatory challenges: Implementing effective AI regulation faces substantial economic and political hurdles.

  • Delaying AI progress by 10 years could cost tech companies an estimated $5 trillion in expected value
  • Major stakeholders actively resist regulation and have considerable political influence
  • International cooperation between competing powers like the U.S. and China presents additional complications

Funding perspective: Increasing alignment funding offers a potentially more achievable path forward.

  • Raising annual AI alignment spending from $0.2 billion to $1.6 billion represents a relatively modest increase compared to other government expenditures
  • Early investment helps build expertise and raises the “Overton window” for future alignment spending
  • Current funding levels are minimal compared to the U.S. military budget of $800 billion annually

Strategic implications: While both increased regulation and funding deserve attention, the relative ease of implementing funding changes suggests a practical starting point.

  • Creating permanent ASI prevention mechanisms would require unprecedented global cooperation
  • No world leader has yet demonstrated willingness to make serious sacrifices over AI risk
  • The AI alignment community can pursue both funding increases and regulatory measures simultaneously

Looking ahead: The path forward likely requires a multi-pronged approach that leverages both funding and regulation, rather than treating them as mutually exclusive options. Success may depend on finding ways to balance immediate practical steps with longer-term strategic goals.

Should you increase AI alignment funding, or increase AI regulation?

Recent News

Russian disinformation campaign triples AI-generated content in 8 months

Operation Overload now emails fact-checkers directly, asking them to investigate its own fake content.

United Launch Alliance, er, launches RocketGPT AI assistant for aerospace operations

The ITAR-compliant system handles "drudgery" for 150 staff while humans retain final authority.