×
A new AI safety initiative launches as Newsom vetoes California bill
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

Governor Newsom vetoes major AI regulation bill: California Governor Gavin Newsom has vetoed SB1047, a comprehensive artificial intelligence regulation bill authored by State Senator Scott Wiener, citing concerns about its broad scope and potential impact on AI innovation in the state.

  • The bill aimed to establish safety and testing requirements for large-scale AI programs to prevent catastrophic risks.
  • Newsom argued that the bill’s stringent standards applied even to basic functions of large systems, potentially hindering beneficial AI development.
  • The governor expressed concern that the bill’s focus on large-scale models could create a false sense of security, overlooking potential dangers from smaller, specialized AI models.

New academic initiative announced: In place of the vetoed bill, Newsom has launched an initiative to develop AI testing and safety rules for California, led by prominent academics from Stanford and UC Berkeley.

  • The initiative aims to create “responsible guardrails” for the deployment of generative AI.
  • Key figures involved include Fei-Fei Li from Stanford’s AI lab and Jennifer Chayes, Dean of UC Berkeley’s College of Computing, Data Science, and Society.
  • The exact form and outcomes of this initiative, whether it will result in an executive order, legislation, or other measures, remain unclear.

Legislative context and industry reactions: The veto of SB1047 comes after intense lobbying efforts by AI companies and industry stakeholders who argued the bill would stifle innovation and force businesses out of California.

  • Newsom has signed 17 AI-related bills in the past month, addressing issues such as deepfakes, digital identity protection, and AI voice disclosures.
  • Meta, a vocal opponent of SB1047, expressed support for the veto, stating the bill would have hindered AI innovation and job creation.
  • The Future of Life Institute, which supported the bill, criticized the veto, arguing it leaves Californians vulnerable to risks from unregulated AI development.

Senator Wiener’s response: The bill’s author, Senator Scott Wiener, strongly disagreed with Newsom’s reasoning for the veto, defending the bill’s empirical basis and criticizing the governor’s approach.

  • Wiener stated that the bill was crafted by leading AI experts and called the implications that it wasn’t based on empirical evidence “patently absurd.”
  • He expressed disappointment that the governor hadn’t raised his concerns during the legislative process but committed to engaging with the new AI safety working group.
  • Wiener emphasized that despite the setback, California will continue to lead on AI safety issues.

Broader implications for AI regulation: The veto of SB1047 and the announcement of the academic initiative highlight the ongoing challenges in balancing AI innovation with public safety concerns.

  • The debate surrounding the bill has brought AI safety issues to the forefront of international discussions.
  • The veto may influence future attempts at AI regulation in other states and at the federal level.
  • The tension between rapid technological advancement and the need for appropriate safeguards remains a central challenge for policymakers and industry leaders alike.
Newsom vetoes landmark California AI bill authored by Wiener, announces academic AI safety initiative

Recent News

Baidu reports steepest revenue drop in 2 years amid slowdown

China's tech giant Baidu saw revenue drop 3% despite major AI investments, signaling broader challenges for the nation's technology sector amid economic headwinds.

How to manage risk in the age of AI

A conversation with Palo Alto Networks CEO about his approach to innovation as new technologies and risks emerge.

How to balance bold, responsible and successful AI deployment

Major companies are establishing AI governance structures and training programs while racing to deploy generative AI for competitive advantage.