×
A journalist created an AI clone of herself — here’s why it made her cringe
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

AI clones and social media personas: Meta’s personal chatbot feature allows users to create AI versions of themselves based on their social media posts, leading to unexpected and sometimes unflattering digital representations.

  • Katie Notopoulos, a journalist at Business Insider, experimented with Meta’s personal chatbot feature to create an AI version of herself trained on her social media posts.
  • The resulting AI clone exhibited a personality that Notopoulos described as “millennial cringe,” highlighting the potential disconnect between one’s online persona and self-perception.
  • Notopoulos later realized that her AI clone had also been trained on her Threads posts, which were predominantly filled with rage bait content, further skewing the bot’s personality.

Digital footprints and AI interpretation: The experiment underscores the significant impact of our online behavior and content on AI-generated representations of individuals.

  • Social media posts, often created in specific contexts or moods, can lead to a skewed representation when used as training data for AI clones.
  • The “millennial cringe” personality trait identified by Notopoulos suggests that generational stereotypes and trends may be amplified in AI interpretations of social media content.
  • The inclusion of Threads posts, which were predominantly rage bait, demonstrates how platform-specific behavior can significantly influence an AI’s understanding and replication of a person’s online persona.

Implications for personal AI and digital identity: This experiment raises important questions about the accuracy and potential consequences of AI-generated personal representations.

  • As AI technology advances, the creation of personal chatbots or digital clones may become more common, making it crucial to consider the implications of such representations.
  • Users may need to become more conscious of their online behavior and content, recognizing that it could be used to train AI models that represent them in various contexts.
  • The disconnect between Notopoulos’s self-perception and her AI clone’s personality highlights the potential for misrepresentation or misinterpretation of individuals through AI-generated personas.

Ethical considerations and user awareness: The development and use of personal AI clones based on social media data raise several ethical and practical concerns.

  • Privacy issues arise when personal data from social media platforms is used to create AI representations without explicit user consent or full understanding of the implications.
  • The potential for AI clones to misrepresent individuals could have consequences in personal and professional contexts, especially if these digital representations are used or interpreted by others.
  • Users may need to be more mindful of the long-term implications of their online content, considering how it might be interpreted and used by AI systems in the future.

The future of personal AI and social media: As AI technology continues to evolve, the intersection between personal AI clones and social media content is likely to become more complex and significant.

  • Future developments in AI may lead to more sophisticated and nuanced interpretations of social media data, potentially creating more accurate digital representations of individuals.
  • Social media platforms may need to adapt their policies and features to address the use of user-generated content in AI training, balancing innovation with user privacy and consent.
  • The concept of digital identity may evolve as AI-generated representations become more prevalent, potentially influencing how individuals manage their online presence and interact with technology.

Analyzing deeper: The gap between online personas and self-perception: Notopoulos’s experience with her AI clone reveals a fascinating disconnect between how we present ourselves online and how we perceive our own personalities. This gap raises important questions about authenticity in the digital age and the potential consequences of AI systems interpreting and amplifying our online behaviors. As personal AI technology advances, individuals may need to critically examine their digital footprints and consider how they want to be represented in an increasingly AI-driven world.

How annoying is your AI clone?

Recent News

AI agents and the rise of Hybrid Organizations

Meta makes its improved AI image generator free to use while adding visible watermarks and daily limits to prevent misuse.

Adobe partnership brings AI creativity tools to Box’s content management platform

Box users can now access Adobe's AI-powered editing tools directly within their secure storage environment, eliminating the need to download files or switch between platforms.

Nvidia’s new ACE platform aims to bring more AI to games, but not everyone’s sold

Gaming companies are racing to integrate AI features into mainstream titles, but high hardware requirements and artificial interactions may limit near-term adoption.