Apple has strongly denied a Politico report claiming the company modified its AI training guidelines following Donald Trump’s election, specifically around topics like diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI), vaccines, and Trump-related content. The denial comes amid broader industry scrutiny over how tech companies handle politically sensitive topics in AI development.
What Politico claimed: The publication reviewed internal documents showing Apple updated its AI training guidelines in March 2025, allegedly making significant changes to how its models handle sensitive political topics.
• The report claimed sections on “intolerance” and “systemic racism” were removed from training materials.
• Topics like DEI policies, Gaza, Crimea, Kashmir, Taiwan, vaccines, and elections were reportedly added to a “sensitive” topics list.
• The March document allegedly included more detailed guidance on handling Trump-related issues, though with no changes to the model’s ultimate behavior regarding the former president.
How the training process works: Apple contracts with Transperfect, a translation services company, for AI data annotation work at their Barcelona office with about 200 employees.
• Data annotators label and categorize raw data, evaluate AI-generated outputs, and flag issues like bias or safety risks.
• Their structured feedback helps researchers fine-tune and retrain AI models.
• This annotation process is considered one of the most critical steps in AI training across the tech industry.
In plain English: Think of data annotators like editors who review and grade AI responses, teaching the system what constitutes good or problematic answers. Their feedback helps the AI learn to handle different topics more appropriately, much like how a teacher’s corrections help students improve their work.
Apple’s response: An Apple spokesperson categorically denied changing the company’s overall AI policy approach, though didn’t specifically address the individual changes mentioned in the report.
• “Apple Intelligence is grounded in our Responsible AI principles, which guide every step from training to evaluation. Claims that we’ve shifted this approach or policy are completely false,” the spokesperson said.
• The company emphasized it trains its own models and works with third-party vendors using structured topics, including sensitive ones, with regular updates to improve performance.
Transperfect also pushes back: Co-CEO Phil Shawe denied the claims but provided a somewhat ambiguous response about the company’s work processes.
• “These claims are completely false, and we deny them in the strongest possible terms,” Shawe stated.
• He noted the company regularly receives updated guidelines, with more than 70 updates over the past year, but claimed “none of these changed any policy, which has remained consistent.”
• Politico noted Shawe’s statement didn’t specify which particular claims he was refuting.
Why this matters: The controversy highlights the ongoing tension tech companies face in developing AI systems that handle politically charged topics while maintaining neutrality and avoiding bias accusations from multiple sides of the political spectrum.
Recent Stories
DOE fusion roadmap targets 2030s commercial deployment as AI drives $9B investment
The Department of Energy has released a new roadmap targeting commercial-scale fusion power deployment by the mid-2030s, though the plan lacks specific funding commitments and relies on scientific breakthroughs that have eluded researchers for decades. The strategy emphasizes public-private partnerships and positions AI as both a research tool and motivation for developing fusion energy to meet data centers' growing electricity demands. The big picture: The DOE's roadmap aims to "deliver the public infrastructure that supports the fusion private sector scale up in the 2030s," but acknowledges it cannot commit to specific funding levels and remains subject to Congressional appropriations. Why...
Oct 17, 2025Tying it all together: Credo’s purple cables power the $4B AI data center boom
Credo, a Silicon Valley semiconductor company specializing in data center cables and chips, has seen its stock price more than double this year to $143.61, following a 245% surge in 2024. The company's signature purple cables, which cost between $300-$500 each, have become essential infrastructure for AI data centers, positioning Credo to capitalize on the trillion-dollar AI infrastructure expansion as hyperscalers like Amazon, Microsoft, and Elon Musk's xAI rapidly build out massive computing facilities. What you should know: Credo's active electrical cables (AECs) are becoming indispensable for connecting the massive GPU clusters required for AI training and inference. The company...
Oct 17, 2025Vatican launches Latin American AI network for human development
The Vatican hosted a two-day conference bringing together 50 global experts to explore how artificial intelligence can advance peace, social justice, and human development. The event launched the Latin American AI Network for Integral Human Development and established principles for ethical AI governance that prioritize human dignity over technological advancement. What you should know: The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, the Vatican's research body for social issues, organized the "Digital Rerum Novarum" conference on October 16-17, combining academic research with practical AI applications. Participants included leading experts from MIT, Microsoft, Columbia University, the UN, and major European institutions. The conference...