CO/AI Subscribe
Thursday · June 18, 2026 · Issue No. 900
Video

MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell’s lawyer admits to using AI to create court document

Watch on YouTube

AI in the courtroom: a daring legal mishap

In a jaw-dropping turn of events that should make every legal professional sit up straight, MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell's attorneys have admitted to using AI to generate court documents in his ongoing legal battle with Dominion Voting Systems. This isn't just another tech-meets-law story; it represents a defining moment in how artificial intelligence is creeping into professional domains where human expertise and accountability are paramount.

  • AI-generated legal fiction: The attorneys filed a court brief containing an astonishing 30 fabricated legal concepts and citations to non-existent cases—all created by ChatGPT.

  • Judicial fury: A Colorado judge threatened disciplinary action against the lawyers until one admitted they had "accidentally" submitted the unvetted AI-generated version.

  • Credibility collapse: This incident damages not only the attorneys' professional standing but further complicates Lindell's already controversial legal defense in the Dominion Voting Systems lawsuit.

The most troubling aspect of this situation isn't simply that AI was used, but that it was deployed without proper oversight in a context where accuracy and truth are foundational requirements. Legal professionals are bound by ethical standards that include diligent verification of facts and sources. The "we didn't check it" defense reveals a dangerous misunderstanding of how generative AI works and the responsibilities of those who use it.

This isn't merely a technical mishap but a collision between technological capabilities and professional duty. The legal industry has always moved cautiously with new technologies, and for good reason—the stakes in legal proceedings directly impact people's rights, freedom, and financial well-being. The judge's furious response signals how the judiciary views AI assistance without human verification: not as innovation, but as potential malpractice.

Beyond the courtroom: Lessons for every professional

While this example comes from law, similar scenarios are unfolding across professional services. Financial advisors, healthcare providers, and management consultants are all experimenting with AI tools that promise increased productivity but come with significant risks.

Consider the recent case of a doctor who used AI to summarize patient notes and inadvertently included fabricated medical history in official records. Or the financial

Share: X LinkedIn Email
Video Feed

More videos

All videos →
Claude Fable 5: When Capability Meets Economics
Video

Claude Fable 5: When Capability Meets Economics

Anthropic released Cloud Fable 5 with a paradox built in: safeguards sophisticated enough to let a mythosclass model...

Run Agentic AI Entirely on Your Mac—No Cloud, No Latency, No Privacy Tradeoffs
Video

Run Agentic AI Entirely on Your Mac—No Cloud, No Latency, No Privacy Tradeoffs

Apple’s MLX framework is mature enough now that you can run serious agentic AI workflows locally on Silicon...

Hermes Agent Master Class
Video

Hermes Agent Master Class

Welcome to the Hermes Agent Master Class — an 11-episode series taking you from zero to fully leveraging...

CONSULTING

Outsider
Labs.

A management consulting team focused on AI transformations for executives and business owners.

Work with us →