In the rapidly evolving landscape of AI-assisted software development, "vibe coding" has emerged as more than a trendy buzzword. Tom, a YC partner, recently shared his month-long experiment with vibe coding for side projects, revealing a practice that not only delivers impressive results but can be systematically improved through deliberate techniques. As multiple YC founders demonstrate, this evolution from casual prompt engineering to structured development methodology marks a significant shift in how we build software.
Structured planning trumps spontaneity: Tom emphasizes creating comprehensive development plans with your AI before writing any code, maintaining these in markdown files, and implementing section by section rather than attempting to generate entire products at once.
Version control is non-negotiable: Using Git religiously prevents accumulating "layers of crust" from multiple failed AI attempts. When facing bugs, it's better to reset and start clean than to continually patch broken code.
Testing provides essential guardrails: High-level integration tests help catch the LLM's tendency to make unexpected changes to unrelated logic, providing confidence during feature implementation.
Technology choice still matters: Frameworks with established conventions and abundant training data (like Ruby on Rails) tend to yield better AI-generated results than newer languages with less representation in training sets.
The most insightful takeaway from Tom's experience is that successful vibe coding increasingly resembles traditional software engineering best practices. "The overarching theme here is to make the LLM follow the processes that a good professional software developer would use," Tom explains. This represents a significant evolution from earlier AI coding approaches that treated models as magic boxes requiring clever prompting tricks.
This matters because it suggests AI-assisted development is maturing into a legitimate engineering discipline rather than remaining a curiosity. We're witnessing the normalization of AI as a development partner that follows established software engineering principles – modularity, testing, version control, and systematic debugging. The industry is moving beyond the novelty phase toward practical integration of these tools into professional workflows.
Tom's advice is valuable, but my experience implementing these techniques across multiple projects reveals additional considerations. For instance, I've found that AI-generated code