×
UN report claims global AI divide is deepening as most countries left behind
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

A new UN report highlights concerning disparities in global AI development, revealing a deepening technological divide that threatens to leave most countries behind. While a handful of nations and companies dominate AI innovation and investment, the report warns that without deliberate intervention, AI could exacerbate existing inequalities rather than fulfill its promise as a tool for universal economic advancement. This stark assessment emphasizes the need for international cooperation and inclusive policies to ensure AI benefits extend beyond the current power centers.

The big picture: The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) has published a comprehensive report on artificial intelligence that reveals alarming global disparities in AI development and adoption.

  • “History has shown that while technological progress drives economic growth, it does not on its own ensure equitable income distribution or promote inclusive human development,” states UNCTAD Secretary-General Rebeca Grynspan in the report’s preamble.
  • The findings paint a picture of concentrated AI power where approximately 118 countries remain largely excluded from meaningful participation in the AI revolution.

Behind the numbers: Global AI investment is overwhelmingly dominated by a small number of nations, with the United States leading by an extraordinary margin.

  • The United States accounted for $67 billion in private AI investment in 2023, dwarfing China’s $7.8 billion and India’s $1.4 billion.
  • AI spending represented 7% of total investment in 2023 and is projected to reach 29% by 2033, indicating its rapidly growing economic importance.

Key details: The report identifies several critical concerns about AI’s impact on global labor markets and technological development.

  • AI is expected to affect up to 40% of jobs globally, with about one-third of jobs in developed economies at risk of automation.
  • Approximately 100 companies will drive 40% of global research and development, further concentrating technological advancement.
  • Only a few developing nations—notably Brazil, China, India, and the Philippines—have managed to establish significant positions in the AI landscape.

The way forward: UNCTAD’s report outlines specific recommendations to address the widening technological divide and promote more equitable AI development.

  • The creation of a “shared AI resource facility” could help democratize access to AI tools and knowledge.
  • Development of a “public disclosure framework” would increase transparency in AI development and deployment.
  • Increased investment in infrastructure, data, and skills development in underrepresented regions is essential for broader participation.

Why this matters: Without coordinated international action, AI could reinforce existing global inequalities rather than serving as a tool for universal economic advancement.

  • Advanced economies already benefit from larger pools of skilled workers and more developed national AI strategies, giving them a significant head start.
  • The concentration of AI benefits in a handful of nations and companies threatens to create new forms of technological colonialism, leaving most of the world as mere consumers rather than creators.
UN Input On AI: Winners, Losers, And Opportunities

Recent News

AI’s impact on productivity: Strategies to avoid complacency

Maintaining active thinking habits while using AI tools can prevent cognitive complacency without sacrificing productivity gains.

OpenAI launches GPT-4 Turbo with enhanced capabilities

New GPT-4.1 model expands context window to one million tokens while reducing costs by 26 percent compared to its predecessor, addressing efficiency concerns from developers.

AI models struggle with basic physical tasks in manufacturing

Leading AI systems fail at basic manufacturing tasks that human machinists routinely complete, highlighting a potential future where knowledge work becomes automated while physical jobs remain protected from AI disruption.