The escalating legal battle between OpenAI and Elon Musk has taken a dramatic turn with OpenAI’s counter-lawsuit, which alleges Musk’s $97.375 billion bid was an elaborate sabotage attempt rather than a legitimate acquisition offer. This conflict represents a significant power struggle in the artificial intelligence industry, potentially impacting the future development trajectory of advanced AI systems and highlighting the increasingly personal nature of competition between AI companies and their founders.
The big picture: OpenAI has counter-sued Elon Musk, claiming his nearly $100 billion acquisition bid was a “sham” deliberately timed to disrupt the company and scare away legitimate investors.
- The lawsuit alleges Musk’s bid amount of $97.375 billion appears to reference his favorite sci-fi novel, Iain Banks’ “Look to Windward,” rather than being based on OpenAI’s actual financial metrics.
- OpenAI claims Musk provided “no evidence of financing” to support the massive purchase price, further suggesting the offer was not genuine.
Key allegations: OpenAI portrays Musk as attempting to become an “AGI dictator” through gaining control of the company while conducting a “relentless” campaign of harassment.
- The company claims Musk previously sought to have OpenAI absorbed into Tesla in 2018, a proposal that was rejected.
- According to the filing, Musk has since launched rival company xAI and engaged in activities designed to harm OpenAI.
Legal demands: OpenAI is seeking a jury trial, an injunction to halt Musk’s alleged unfair business practices, and financial compensation.
- The company wants Musk to cover costs incurred from reviewing his bid and pay punitive damages for allegedly engaging “in wrongful conduct with malice, oppression, and fraud.”
- OpenAI argues Musk’s actions are designed to impair competition “for the sole benefit of Musk’s xAI” at the expense of public interest.
Reading between the lines: OpenAI is attempting to distance itself from its co-founder while portraying Musk’s actions as self-serving and detrimental to AI advancement.
- The company publicly acknowledged Musk’s entrepreneurial achievements while dismissing his current behavior, stating on X: “Elon is undoubtedly one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time. But these antics are just history on repeat—Elon being all about Elon.”
- The lawsuit suggests OpenAI fears Musk could potentially “tank” its revenue similar to what happened after his acquisition of Twitter.
Recent Stories
DOE fusion roadmap targets 2030s commercial deployment as AI drives $9B investment
The Department of Energy has released a new roadmap targeting commercial-scale fusion power deployment by the mid-2030s, though the plan lacks specific funding commitments and relies on scientific breakthroughs that have eluded researchers for decades. The strategy emphasizes public-private partnerships and positions AI as both a research tool and motivation for developing fusion energy to meet data centers' growing electricity demands. The big picture: The DOE's roadmap aims to "deliver the public infrastructure that supports the fusion private sector scale up in the 2030s," but acknowledges it cannot commit to specific funding levels and remains subject to Congressional appropriations. Why...
Oct 17, 2025Tying it all together: Credo’s purple cables power the $4B AI data center boom
Credo, a Silicon Valley semiconductor company specializing in data center cables and chips, has seen its stock price more than double this year to $143.61, following a 245% surge in 2024. The company's signature purple cables, which cost between $300-$500 each, have become essential infrastructure for AI data centers, positioning Credo to capitalize on the trillion-dollar AI infrastructure expansion as hyperscalers like Amazon, Microsoft, and Elon Musk's xAI rapidly build out massive computing facilities. What you should know: Credo's active electrical cables (AECs) are becoming indispensable for connecting the massive GPU clusters required for AI training and inference. The company...
Oct 17, 2025Vatican launches Latin American AI network for human development
The Vatican hosted a two-day conference bringing together 50 global experts to explore how artificial intelligence can advance peace, social justice, and human development. The event launched the Latin American AI Network for Integral Human Development and established principles for ethical AI governance that prioritize human dignity over technological advancement. What you should know: The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, the Vatican's research body for social issues, organized the "Digital Rerum Novarum" conference on October 16-17, combining academic research with practical AI applications. Participants included leading experts from MIT, Microsoft, Columbia University, the UN, and major European institutions. The conference...