×
AI video generation wastes 90% of what you pay for
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

AI video generation platforms have a significant hidden cost that many users may not anticipate: the payment structure often forces customers to pay for unusable content. Jack Wallen’s experience testing an unnamed AI video generation service reveals that approximately 90% of generated videos were unusable, despite consuming valuable credits. This pricing model creates a substantial efficiency problem that businesses should carefully consider before investing in AI-generated video content.

The core issue: AI video generation services typically charge users based on the number of videos generated rather than the number of satisfactory videos downloaded.

  • When testing one such service, Wallen found that roughly 9 out of 10 AI-generated videos were completely unusable for professional purposes.
  • Even though most outputs were worthless, each generation consumed paid credits regardless of quality or usability.

The financial reality: Using a simplified example of $100 for 100 credits with each video costing 10 credits, users effectively pay $100 for just one usable video when factoring in the 90% failure rate.

  • The company justified this model by explaining that the computational costs of running these AI systems are extremely high and must be passed to consumers.
  • When Wallen suggested charging only for downloaded videos, the company declined, citing operational expenses.

Why this matters: This hidden inefficiency significantly impacts the true cost-benefit analysis for businesses considering AI video generation.

  • What initially seems like a cost-saving alternative to traditional video production may actually represent poor value when accounting for the high percentage of unusable outputs.
  • Companies under economic pressure might mistakenly view AI video generation as a budget-friendly option without understanding the actual cost per usable video.

The bottom line: Consumers should thoroughly test these services through free trials before committing financial resources.

  • For many businesses, hiring traditional video production companies might ultimately be more cost-effective despite higher upfront pricing.
  • Users need to evaluate whether getting what you pay for only 10% of the time represents a worthwhile investment.
The hidden cost of AI video generators that no one warns you about

Recent News

Google’s new Search AI Mode hopes to overcome prior errors like bizarre dietary advice

Google's refined Search AI Mode delivers concise, more accurate summaries using Gemini 2.0, representing a more cautious approach following previous factual blunders.

AI transforms architecture in Refik Anadol’s Frank Gehry tribute

The immersive installation uses machine learning to transform Gehry's 65-year archive into a six-chapter visual experience projected onto the museum's interior walls.

AI voice cloning risks exposed by Consumer Reports, Descript more secure than ElevenLabs

Consumer Reports investigation finds most voice cloning platforms lack adequate technical safeguards, with only two of six tested services implementing meaningful protections against unauthorized voice replication.